A framework for determining unsaturated zone water quality time lags at catchment scale

• Published in: Agriculture, ecosystems & environment Vol. 236; pp. 234 - 242
• Main Authors: Vero, Sara E., Healy, Mark G., Henry, Tiernan, Creamer, Rachel E., Ibrahim, Tristan G., Richards, Karl G., Mellander, Per-Erik, McDonald, Noeleen T., Fenton, Owen
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 02.01.2017; Elsevier BV
• Subjects: Aeration zone; Agricultural management; Agriculture; Arable land; Atmospheric models; Boundary conditions; Catchment areas; Catchment scale; Catchments; Complexity; Computational fluid dynamics; Datasets; Estimates; Fluid flow; Freshwater; Grasslands; Groundwater; Hydraulics; Hydrologic data; Hydrology; Meteorology; Mitigation; Nitrate; Nutrient availability; Nutrient status; Nutrient transport; Nutrients; Regulators; Soil; Soil mapping; Soil maps; Soils; Solute transport; Studies; Time lag; Trajectory analysis; Transport; Trends; Unsaturated; Water framework directive; Water management; Water quality; Ireland; ANE, Eire; Soil; Nitrate; Water framework directive; Unsaturated; Time lag
• ISSN: 0167-8809; 1873-2305
• DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2016.12.001

•Policymakers need to know the time lag between remediation measures and water quality changes.•A methodological toolkit is present for assessing time lag, according to data availability.•This toolkit is demonstrated by estimating time lag ranges in two Irish agricultural catchments.•Soil time lag can prevent attainment of Water Framework Directive goals. The responses of waterbodies to agricultural programmes of measures are frequently delayed by hydrological time lags through the unsaturated zone and groundwater. Time lag may therefore, impede the achievement of remediation deadlines such as those described in the EU Water Framework Directive (WFD). Omitting time lag from catchment characterisation renders evaluation of management practices impossible. Time lag aside, regulators at national scale can only manage the expectations of policy-makers at larger scales (e.g. European Union) by demonstrating positive nutrient trajectories in catchments failing to achieve at least ‘good’ status. Presently, a flexible tool for developing spatial and temporal estimates of trends in water quality/nutrient transport and time lags is not available. The objectives of the present study were first to develop such a flexible, parsimonious framework incorporating existing soil maps, meteorological data and a structured modelling approach, and to secondly, to demonstrate its use in a grassland and an arable catchment (∼10km2) in Ireland, assuming full implementation of measures in 2012. Data pertaining to solute transport (meteorology, soil hydraulics, depth of profile and boundary conditions) were collected for both catchments. Low complexity textural data alone gave comparable estimates of nutrient trajectories and time lags but with no spatial or soil series information. Taking a high complexity approach, coupling high resolution soil mapping (1:10,000) with national scale (1:25,000) representative profile datasets to <5m depth, indicated trends in nutrient transport of 10–12 months and 13–17 months throughout the grassland and arable catchments, respectively. For the same conditions, regulators relying on data from groundwater sampling to test the efficacy of the present measures would be delayed by 61–76 months and 46–79 months, respectively. Variation in meteorological datasets enabled temporal analysis of the trends in nutrient transport and time lag estimates. Such a tool could help catchment scientists to better characterise and manage catchments, determine locations for monitoring or mitigation, assess the efficacy of current measures, and ultimately, advise policy makers and regulators.