Activation of spinal locomotor circuits in the decerebrated cat by spinal epidural and/or intraspinal electrical stimulation

Abstract The present study was designed to further compare the stepping-like movements generated via epidural (ES) and/or intraspinal (IS) stimulation. We examined the ability to generate stepping-like movements in response to ES and/or IS of spinal lumbar segments L1–L7 in decerebrate cats. ES (5–1...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBrain research Vol. 1600; pp. 84 - 92
Main Authors Lavrov, Igor, Musienko, Pavel E, Selionov, Victor A, Zdunowski, Sharon, Roy, Roland R, Reggie Edgerton, V, Gerasimenko, Yury
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier B.V 10.03.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract The present study was designed to further compare the stepping-like movements generated via epidural (ES) and/or intraspinal (IS) stimulation. We examined the ability to generate stepping-like movements in response to ES and/or IS of spinal lumbar segments L1–L7 in decerebrate cats. ES (5–10 Hz) of the dorsal surface of the spinal cord at L3–L7 induced hindlimb stepping-like movements on a moving treadmill belt, but with no rhythmic activity in the forelimbs. IS (60 Hz) of the dorsolateral funiculus at L1–L3 (depth of 0.5–1.0 mm from the dorsal surface of the spinal cord) induced quadrupedal stepping-like movements. Forelimb movements appeared first, followed by stepping-like movements in the hindlimbs. ES and IS simultaneously enhanced the rhythmic performance of the hindlimbs more robustly than ES or IS alone. The differences in the stimulation parameters, site of stimulation, and motor outputs observed during ES vs. IS suggest that different neural mechanisms were activated to induce stepping-like movements. The effects of ES may be mediated more via dorsal structures in the lumbosacral region of the spinal cord, whereas the effects of IS may be mediated via more ventral propriospinal networks and/or brainstem locomotor areas. Furthermore, the more effective facilitation of the motor output during simultaneous ES and IS may reflect some convergence of pathways on the same interneuronal populations involved in the regulation of locomotion.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0006-8993
1872-6240
DOI:10.1016/j.brainres.2014.11.003