Effectiveness of Cross-Flow Microfiltration for Removal of Microorganisms Associated with Unpasteurized Liquid Egg White from Process Plant

Thermal preservation is used by the egg industry to ensure the microbiological safety of liquid egg white (LEW); however, it does not eliminate all microorganisms and impairs some of the delicate functional properties of LEW. In this study, a pilot‐scale cross‐flow microfiltration (MF) process was d...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of food science Vol. 74; no. 6; pp. M319 - M327
Main Authors Mukhopadhyay, S., Tomasula, P.M., Van Hekken, D., Luchansky, J.B., Call, J.E., Porto-Fett, A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Malden, USA Blackwell Publishing Inc 01.08.2009
Wiley
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Thermal preservation is used by the egg industry to ensure the microbiological safety of liquid egg white (LEW); however, it does not eliminate all microorganisms and impairs some of the delicate functional properties of LEW. In this study, a pilot‐scale cross‐flow microfiltration (MF) process was designed to remove the natural microflora present in commercial LEW, obtained from a local egg‐breaking plant, while maintaining the nutritional and functional properties of the LEW. LEW, containing approximately 106 ± 1.7 colony forming units (CFU) per milliliter of total aerobic bacteria, was microfiltered using a ceramic membrane with a nominal pore size of 1.4 μm, at a cross‐flow velocity of 6 m/s. To facilitate MF, LEW was screened, homogenized, and then diluted (1 : 2, w/w) with distilled water containing 0.5% sodium chloride. Homogenized LEW was found to have a threefold lower viscosity than unhomogenized LEW. Influence of MF temperature (25 and 40 °C) and pH (6 and 9) on permeate flux, transmission of egg white nutrients across the membrane, and microbial removal efficiency were evaluated. The pH had a significantly greater influence on permeate flux than temperature. Permeate flux increased by almost 148% when pH of LEW was adjusted from pH 9 to pH 6 at 40 °C. Influence of temperature on permeate flux, at a constant pH, however, was found to be inconclusive. Microbial removal efficiency was at least 5 log10 CFU/mL. Total protein and SDS‐PAGE analysis indicated that this MF process did not alter the protein composition of the permeate, compared to that of the feed LEW, and that the foaming properties of LEW were retained in the postfiltered samples.
Bibliography:istex:DE753075583091E534B78BDC810519DD957D749E
ArticleID:JFDS1228
ark:/67375/WNG-0KF9ZF7D-3
Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture.
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0022-1147
1750-3841
DOI:10.1111/j.1750-3841.2009.01228.x