Engagement in an Online Cultural Competency Training

Engagement with online cultural competency training has not been well studied. We examined knowledge, attitudes, and skills differences among medical students, physicians, and other professionals in an online cultural competency education program. A total of 1745 participants completed up to four on...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSouthern medical journal (Birmingham, Ala.) Vol. 111; no. 4; p. 199
Main Authors Crocker, Jordan, Massie, Jr, F Stanford, Estrada, Carlos A
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.04.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Engagement with online cultural competency training has not been well studied. We examined knowledge, attitudes, and skills differences among medical students, physicians, and other professionals in an online cultural competency education program. A total of 1745 participants completed up to four online modules aimed at exploring stereotype, bias, diet, and religion among African American patients with hypertension. We examined knowledge, attitudes, and self-reported skills with 17 multiple-choice questions embedded in the 4 modules. Participants received comparative responses with their peers. Between 75% and 84% of participants knew the definition of and <50% knew the definition of (47% students, 36% physicians, 33% others, < 0.001). Most responded that minorities perceive bias (98%-100%) and believe that evidence exists showing that bias affects decision making (62%-69%). Although most perceive that religious and spiritual beliefs affect reaction to illness often (78% students, 68% physicians, 79% others, < 0.001), few would ask about religious beliefs during a typical encounter (13% students, 16% physicians, 30% others, < 0.001). All of the participants struggled to define bias; however, most agreed that minorities perceive bias in the care they receive. We examined usage and interaction with the online content as a dimension of engagement.
ISSN:1541-8243
DOI:10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000790