Association of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the United States from 2004 to 2009

• Published in: Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) Vol. 62; no. 6; pp. 1723 - 1730
• Main Authors: Younossi, Zobair M., Otgonsuren, Munkhzul, Henry, Linda, Venkatesan, Chapy, Mishra, Alita, Erario, Madeline, Hunt, Sharon
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.12.2015
• Subjects: Aged; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - complications; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - epidemiology; Confidence intervals; Female; Hepatitis B virus; Hepatitis C virus; Humans; Liver cancer; Liver cirrhosis; Liver diseases; Liver Neoplasms - complications; Liver Neoplasms - epidemiology; Male; Medicare; Mortality; Multivariate analysis; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease - complications; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease - epidemiology; Prevalence; Survival Rate; Time Factors; United States; United States
• ISSN: 0270-9139; 1527-3350
• DOI: 10.1002/hep.28123

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is increasingly reported in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Our aim was to assess the prevalence and mortality of patients with NAFLD‐HCC. We examined Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registries (2004‐2009) with Medicare‐linkage files for HCC, which was identified by the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, third edition codes using topography and morphology codes 8170‐8175. Medicare‐linked data was used to identify NAFLD, hepatitis C virus (HCV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), alcoholic liver disease (ALD), and other liver disease using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes. NAFLD was also defined by clinical diagnosis (cryptogenic cirrhosis, obese‐diabetics with cryptogenic liver disease). A logistic regression model was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for risk of HCC. In addition, adjusted hazard ratios for 1‐year mortality were estimated by Cox's proportional hazard regression. A total of 4,929 HCC cases and 14,937 controls without HCC were included. Of the HCC cases, 54.9% were related to HCV, 16.4% to ALD, 14.1% to NAFLD, and 9.5% to HBV. Across the 6‐year period (2004 to 2009), the number of NAFLD‐HCC showed a 9% annual increase. NAFLD‐HCC were older, had shorter survival time, more heart disease, and were more likely to die from their primary liver cancer (all P < 0.0001). Of those who received a transplant after HCC (n = 488), only 5% were related to NAFLD‐HCC. In multivariate analysis, NAFLD increased the risk of 1‐year mortality (OR, 1.21; 95% CI: 1.01‐1.45). Additionally, older age, lower income, unstaged HCC increased risk of 1‐year mortality while receiving a liver transplant (LT), and having localized tumor stage were protective (all P < 0.05). Conclusions: NAFLD is becoming a major cause of HCC in the United States. NAFLD HCC is associated with shorter survival time, more advanced tumor stage, and lower possibility of receiving a LT. (Hepatology 2015;62:1723–1730)