Nanocomposite structure of two-line ferrihydrite powder from total scattering

Ferrihydrite is one of the most important iron-containing minerals on Earth. Yet determination of its atomic-scale structure has been frustrated by its intrinsically poor crystallinity. The key difficulty is that physically-different models can appear consistent with the same experimental data. Usin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCommunications chemistry Vol. 3; no. 1; p. 22
Main Authors Funnell, Nicholas P., Fulford, Maxwell F., Inoué, Sayako, Kletetschka, Karel, Michel, F. Marc, Goodwin, Andrew L.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Nature Publishing Group UK 21.02.2020
Nature Publishing Group
Springer Nature
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Ferrihydrite is one of the most important iron-containing minerals on Earth. Yet determination of its atomic-scale structure has been frustrated by its intrinsically poor crystallinity. The key difficulty is that physically-different models can appear consistent with the same experimental data. Using X-ray total scattering and a nancomposite reverse Monte Carlo approach, we evaluate the two principal contending models—one a multi-phase system without tetrahedral iron(III), and the other a single phase with tetrahedral iron(III). Our methodology is unique in considering explicitly the complex nanocomposite structure the material adopts: namely, crystalline domains embedded in a poorly-ordered matrix. The multi-phase model requires unphysical structural rearrangements to fit the data, whereas the single-phase model accounts for the data straightforwardly. Hence the latter provides the more accurate description of the short- and intermediate-range order of ferrihydrite. We discuss how this approach might allow experiment-driven (in)validation of complex models for important nanostructured phases beyond ferrihydrite. Although a geologically important mineral, the atomic-scale structure of ferrihydrite remains unresolved. Here the authors combine X-ray total scattering and reverse Monto Carlo to evaluate the two principal contending models, explicitly considering the material’s complex nanocomposite structure.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
USDOE Office of Science (SC)
National Science Foundation (NSF)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)
279705; 788144; FG02-06ER15786; AC02-06CH11357
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Basic Energy Sciences (BES). Chemical Sciences, Geosciences & Biosciences Division
ISSN:2399-3669
2399-3669
DOI:10.1038/s42004-020-0269-2