High Quality Rather than High Model Probability: Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding with Neural Metrics

In Neural Machine Translation, it is typically assumed that the sentence with the highest estimated probability should also be the translation with the highest quality as measured by humans. In this work, we question this assumption and show that model estimates and translation quality only vaguely...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inTransactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics Vol. 10; pp. 811 - 825
Main Authors Freitag, Markus, Grangier, David, Tan, Qijun, Liang, Bowen
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published One Broadway, 12th Floor, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA MIT Press 27.07.2022
MIT Press Journals, The
The MIT Press
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2307-387X
2307-387X
DOI10.1162/tacl_a_00491

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In Neural Machine Translation, it is typically assumed that the sentence with the highest estimated probability should also be the translation with the highest quality as measured by humans. In this work, we question this assumption and show that model estimates and translation quality only vaguely correlate. We apply Minimum Bayes Risk (MBR) decoding on unbiased samples to optimize diverse automated metrics of translation quality as an alternative inference strategy to beam search. Instead of targeting the hypotheses with the highest model probability, MBR decoding extracts the hypotheses with the highest estimated quality. Our experiments show that the combination of a neural translation model with a neural reference-based metric, B , results in significant improvement in human evaluations. This improvement is obtained with translations different from classical beam-search output: These translations have much lower model likelihood and are less favored by surface metrics like B .
Bibliography:2022
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:2307-387X
2307-387X
DOI:10.1162/tacl_a_00491