Psychopathic traits in young offenders vs. non-offenders in similar socioeconomic condition
To analyze the differences in psychopathic traits between offender and non-offender youths with similar socioeconomic backgrounds. The Psychopathy Checklist Revised (PCL-R) scale was used to identify whether 39 young offenders with no history of mental disorders or criteria for psychopathy exhibited...
Saved in:
Published in | Revista brasileira de psiquiatria Vol. 36; no. 3; pp. 241 - 244 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Brazil
Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria
01.09.2014
Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP) |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | To analyze the differences in psychopathic traits between offender and non-offender youths with similar socioeconomic backgrounds.
The Psychopathy Checklist Revised (PCL-R) scale was used to identify whether 39 young offenders with no history of mental disorders or criteria for psychopathy exhibited differences in its total score, and specifically for factor 1 or factor 2 of this scale, when compared with 32 other young people, living in similar socioeconomic conditions, who had not committed offenses.
We observed statistically significant between-group differences (p < 0.01) in mean PCL-R scores, with a mean score of 13.4 in the offender group vs. 2.1 in the non-offender group. We also detected significant between-group differences when we analyzed mean factor 1 (p < 0.01) and factor 2 (p < 0.01) scores separately. Although the groups exhibited statistically significant difference in educational attainment, between-group comparison of mean PCL-R scores controlling for educational attainment by analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) showed that the difference in PCL-R scores remained statistically significant (p < 0.01).
We conclude that, in this sample, the presence of both primary (interpersonal/affective characteristics) and secondary (lifestyle/antisocial behavior) psychopathic traits differed between offender and non-offender youths, even when excluding psychopathy and other mental disorders from the assessments. These results suggest a need for wide-ranging interventions, not restricted to socioeconomic aspects, for the management of juvenile delinquency. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1516-4446 1809-452X 1809-452X |
DOI: | 10.1590/1516-4446-2013-1127 |