Effect of background parenchymal enhancement on breast cancer detection with magnetic resonance imaging
Abstract Objective To investigate whether background parenchymal enhancement ( BPE) may influence the sensitivity of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (DCE-MR) imaging in breast cancer detection. Materials and methods A total of 180 consecutive women with 194 breast cancers underwent MR i...
Saved in:
Published in | Diagnostic and interventional imaging Vol. 97; no. 3; pp. 315 - 320 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
France
Elsevier Masson SAS
01.03.2016
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Abstract Objective To investigate whether background parenchymal enhancement ( BPE) may influence the sensitivity of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (DCE-MR) imaging in breast cancer detection. Materials and methods A total of 180 consecutive women with 194 breast cancers underwent MR imaging examination. Women were assigned to two different groups depending on the degree of BPE. Group 1 consisted of women with minimal or mild BPE and group 2 of women with moderate or marked BPE. The distributions of histotypes of tumors within the two groups were compared using the χ2 test. Difference in sensitivities of DCE-MR imaging for tumor detection between the two groups was searched for using the Student t -test. Results No differences in terms of distributions of histotypes of tumors between the two groups of women were found ( P = 0.5). The 11% difference in sensitivity of DCE-MR imaging for tumor detection between group 1 (91/92; 99%; 95% CI: 94–100%) and group 2 (90/102; 88%; 95% CI: 80–94%) was statistically significant ( P = 0.0058). Conclusion The sensitivity of DCE-MR imaging is significantly lower in women with moderate and marked BPE as compared with women with minimal and mild BPE regardless of cancer histotype. BPE could represent a limitation for breast MR imaging interpretation and should be indicated in MR imaging reports. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 2211-5684 2211-5684 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.diii.2015.12.006 |