Effects of scaffold architecture on cranial bone healing

Abstract In the present study, polycaprolactone–tricalcium phosphate (PCL/TCP) scaffolds with two different fibre laydown patterns, which were coated with hydroxyapatite and gelatine, were used as an approach for optimizing bone regeneration in a critical-sized calvarial defect. After 12 weeks, bone...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery Vol. 43; no. 4; pp. 506 - 513
Main Authors Berner, A, Woodruff, M.A, Lam, C.X.F, Arafat, M.T, Saifzadeh, S, Steck, R, Ren, J, Nerlich, M, Ekaputra, A.K, Gibson, I, Hutmacher, D.W
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Denmark Elsevier Ltd 01.04.2014
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract In the present study, polycaprolactone–tricalcium phosphate (PCL/TCP) scaffolds with two different fibre laydown patterns, which were coated with hydroxyapatite and gelatine, were used as an approach for optimizing bone regeneration in a critical-sized calvarial defect. After 12 weeks, bone regeneration was quantified using microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) analysis, biomechanical testing, and histological evaluation. Notably, the experimental groups with coated scaffolds showed lower bone formation and lower biomechanical properties within the defect compared to the uncoated scaffolds. Surprisingly, the different laydown pattern of the fibres resulted in different bone formation and biomechanical properties: the 0°/60°/120° scaffolds revealed lower bone formation and biomechanical properties compared to the 0°/90° scaffolds in all the experimental groups. Therefore, future bone regeneration strategies utilizing scaffolds should consider scaffold architecture as an important factor during the scaffold optimization stages in order to move closer to a clinical application.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0901-5027
1399-0020
DOI:10.1016/j.ijom.2013.05.008