Compositional Evaluation on Japanese Textual Entailment and Similarity

Natural Language Inference (NLI) and Semantic Textual Similarity (STS) are widely used benchmark tasks for compositional evaluation of pre-trained language models. Despite growing interest in linguistic universals, most NLI/STS studies have focused almost exclusively on English. In particular, there...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inTransactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics Vol. 10; pp. 1266 - 1284
Main Authors Yanaka, Hitomi, Mineshima, Koji
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published One Broadway, 12th Floor, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA MIT Press 22.11.2022
MIT Press Journals, The
The MIT Press
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Natural Language Inference (NLI) and Semantic Textual Similarity (STS) are widely used benchmark tasks for compositional evaluation of pre-trained language models. Despite growing interest in linguistic universals, most NLI/STS studies have focused almost exclusively on English. In particular, there are no available multilingual NLI/STS datasets in Japanese, which is typologically different from English and can shed light on the currently controversial behavior of language models in matters such as sensitivity to word order and case particles. Against this background, we introduce JSICK, a Japanese NLI/STS dataset that was manually translated from the English dataset SICK. We also present a stress-test dataset for compositional inference, created by transforming syntactic structures of sentences in JSICK to investigate whether language models are sensitive to word order and case particles. We conduct baseline experiments on different pre-trained language models and compare the performance of multilingual models when applied to Japanese and other languages. The results of the stress-test experiments suggest that the current pre-trained language models are insensitive to word order and case marking.
Bibliography:2022
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:2307-387X
2307-387X
DOI:10.1162/tacl_a_00518