Priorities for Rural Lymphoma Survivors: A Qualitative Study
We gathered rural patient perspectives on lymphoma care and unmet needs throughout the treatment course to better understand their attitudes toward treatment and their barriers to participating in clinical research studies. We conducted 12 individual semi-structured telephone interviews in the sprin...
Saved in:
Published in | Clinical lymphoma, myeloma and leukemia Vol. 20; no. 1; pp. 47 - 52.e3 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Elsevier Inc
01.01.2020
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | We gathered rural patient perspectives on lymphoma care and unmet needs throughout the treatment course to better understand their attitudes toward treatment and their barriers to participating in clinical research studies.
We conducted 12 individual semi-structured telephone interviews in the spring of 2018 with lymphoma survivors from rural counties in Georgia. Patients were identified by a residential address in counties classified as rural according to the Rural-Urban Commuting Areas codes. Participants were recruited from regional patient education conferences and from current research participants at a university research hospital in Georgia. The interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis and MAXQDA, version 18.0.8, were used to facilitate a constant comparative coding process during theme development.
The greatest barrier to care was the travel distance. The participants described difficulty navigating between local clinics and larger cancer centers. The lack of communication between the local and specialized clinics complicated the process, and participants had difficulty contacting or seeking advice from the team at the larger cancer centers. Seeking treatment from specialized clinics farther away introduced additional barriers. Most participants agreed that the use of technology was important for improved communication. Participants described lymphoma etiology, subtype-specific studies, alternative therapies, and quality of life as key research priorities.
These findings suggest that targeted research and interventions are necessary to address the specific needs of rural patients with and survivors of lymphoma. To address the disparity in health outcomes within rural populations, healthcare professionals and investigators can use these data to engage rural patients in treatment decision-making and research planning.
A qualitative study of lymphoma survivors living in rural Georgia was conducted using 12 individual semi-structured telephone interviews. The travel distance was the greatest barrier to care, with other issues including communication and navigating between local clinics and larger cancer centers. The participants saw technology as an important solution and detailed their research priorities. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 Author Contributions: C.F. conceived the presented idea, analyzed data, contributed to manuscript writing and editing, and approved the final manuscript. L.C. conducted interviews, analyzed data, transcribed interviews, contributed to manuscript writing and editing, and approved the final manuscript. J.B.P. conducted interviews and focus groups, analyzed data, contributed to manuscript writing and editing, and approved the final manuscript. K.V.D. conducted phone interviews, analyzed data, transcribed interviews, contributed to manuscript writing and editing, and approved the final manuscript. C.B.I. analyzed data, contributed to manuscript writing and editing, and approved the final manuscript. C.D.H. conducted interviews and transcribed interviews, analyzed data, contributed to manuscript writing and editing, and approved the final manuscript. A.A.A. provided help with finding eligible patients in the databases, analyzed data, contributed to manuscript writing and editing, and approved the final manuscript. |
ISSN: | 2152-2650 2152-2669 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.clml.2019.09.599 |