Tubal damage in infertile women: prediction using chlamydia serology

BACKGROUND: The study explores the relationship between serum chlamydia antibody titres (CATs) and detection of tubal damage in infertile women. METHODS: The tubal status and pelvic findings in 1006 women undergoing laparoscopy for infertility were related to CAT, which was measured using the whole‐...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHuman reproduction (Oxford) Vol. 18; no. 9; pp. 1841 - 1847
Main Authors Akande, Valentine A., Hunt, Linda P., Cahill, David J., Caul, E.Owen, Ford, W.Christopher L., Jenkins, Julian M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Oxford University Press 01.09.2003
Oxford Publishing Limited (England)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:BACKGROUND: The study explores the relationship between serum chlamydia antibody titres (CATs) and detection of tubal damage in infertile women. METHODS: The tubal status and pelvic findings in 1006 women undergoing laparoscopy for infertility were related to CAT, which was measured using the whole‐cell inclusion immunofluorescence test. RESULTS: A negative correlation between CAT and age was noted. A linear trend between serum CAT and the likelihood of tubal damage, including severe damage, was observed (P < 0.001). Titres in women with tubal damage (median 1:1024; range <1:64–1:4096) were significantly (P < 0.001) higher than in women with endometriosis alone (median <1:64; range <1:64–1:512) or those with a normal pelvis (median <1:64; range <1:64–1:1024). Women with positive titres were more likely to have pelvic adhesions than tubal occlusion unless titres were very high, when tubal damage was likely to be more severe. CONCLUSIONS: CATs are of predictive value in the detection of tubal damage and are quantitatively related to the severity of damage. For practical clinical purposes, Chlamydia serology is useful mainly as a screening test for the likelihood of tubal damage in infertile women and may facilitate decisions on which women should proceed with further investigations without delay.
Bibliography:4To whom correspondence should be addressed. e‐mail: valentine.akande@bristol.ac.uk
local:deg347
istex:633FCD15DAFA3B95CB7AFA4FA4FD16DD53983E21
ark:/67375/HXZ-ZCJZ7VTV-C
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0268-1161
1460-2350
1460-2350
DOI:10.1093/humrep/deg347