Motorcycle riders’ perception of helmet use: Complaints and dissatisfaction

• Published in: Accident analysis and prevention Vol. 44; no. 1; pp. 111 - 117
• Main Authors: Orsi, C., Stendardo, A., Marinoni, A., Gilchrist, M.D., Otte, D., Chliaoutakis, J., Lajunen, T., Özkan, T., Pereira, J. Dias, Tzamalouka, G., Morandi, A.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Elsevier Ltd 2012
• Subjects: Accident prevention; Accidents, Traffic - prevention & control; Accidents, Traffic - psychology; Adult; Attitude; Case-Control Studies; Case–control study; Equipment Design; Europe; Female; Head Protective Devices; Helmet; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Motorcycle accident; Motorcycles; Multivariate Analysis; Perception; Road safety; Europe; Accident prevention; Motorcycle accident; Perception; Road safety; Helmet; Case–control study
• ISSN: 0001-4575; 1879-2057
• DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.12.029

▶ Multi-national case-control study of motorcycle riders’ perception of helmet use. ▶ Relationship between accident involvement and characteristics of helmet and complaints about the helmet. ▶ Most riders complained about some feature of their helmets. ▶ No significant relations between helmet complaints and crash involvement. ▶ No significant relations between helmet complaints and objective helmet characteristics. In accidents which involve two-wheeled vehicles the helmet plays a life-saving role, but very little is known about the motorcycle rider's perception of the helmet. We evaluated the relationships between having been involved in an accident and dissatisfaction with the helmet, and between the perception of motorcycle riders and the objective features of the helmet. This was a case–control study: riders of motorized two-wheelers who had been involved in accidents (accident cases) were compared against a similarly interviewed sample of riders that had not been in accidents (control cases). Information about the driver, the vehicle and the helmet was collected in all interviews. To evaluate the relationships, logistic regressions were carried out. The majority of drivers were dissatisfied with their helmets, but no evidence was found to link this dissatisfaction with having been involved in an accident. The two most common complaints related to noisiness, followed by the helmet visor. Complaints did not seem to be statistically associated with physical features of the helmet.