Classification of Alzheimer Disease, Mild Cognitive Impairment, and Normal Cognitive Status with Large-Scale Network Analysis Based on Resting-State Functional MR Imaging

To use large-scale network (LSN) analysis to classify subjects with Alzheimer disease (AD), those with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI), and cognitively normal (CN) subjects. The study was conducted with institutional review board approval and was in compliance with HIPAA regulations. Writt...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inRadiology Vol. 259; no. 1; pp. 213 - 221
Main Authors Chen, Gang, Ward, B. Douglas, Xie, Chunming, Li, Wenjun, Wu, Zhilin, Jones, Jennifer L., Franczak, Malgorzata, Antuono, Piero, Li, Shi-Jiang
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oak Brook, IL Radiological Society of North America 01.04.2011
Radiological Society of North America, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To use large-scale network (LSN) analysis to classify subjects with Alzheimer disease (AD), those with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI), and cognitively normal (CN) subjects. The study was conducted with institutional review board approval and was in compliance with HIPAA regulations. Written informed consent was obtained from each participant. Resting-state functional magnetic resonance (MR) imaging was used to acquire the voxelwise time series in 55 subjects with clinically diagnosed AD (n = 20), aMCI (n =15), and normal cognitive function (n = 20). The brains were divided into 116 regions of interest (ROIs). The Pearson product moment correlation coefficients of pairwise ROIs were used to classify these subjects. Error estimation of the classifications was performed with the leave-one-out cross-validation method. Linear regression analysis was performed to analyze the relationship between changes in network connectivity strengths and behavioral scores. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) yielded 87% classification power, 85% sensitivity, and 80% specificity between the AD group and the non-AD group (subjects with aMCI and CN subjects) in the first-step classification. For differentiation between subjects with aMCI and CN subjects, AUC was 95%; sensitivity, 93%; and specificity, 90%. The decreased network indexes were significantly correlated with the Mini-Mental State Examination score in all tested subjects. Similarly, changes in network indexes significantly correlated with Rey Auditory Verbal Leaning Test delayed recall scores in subjects with aMCI and CN subjects. LSN analysis revealed that interconnectivity patterns of brain regions can be used to classify subjects with AD, those with aMCI, and CN subjects. In addition, the altered connectivity networks were significantly correlated with the results of cognitive tests.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
Author contributions: Guarantors of integrity of entire study, C.X., P.A., S.J.L.; study concepts/study design or data acquisition or data analysis/interpretation, all authors; manuscript drafting or manuscript revision for important intellectual content, all authors; manuscript final version approval, all authors; literature research, G.C., C.X., Z.W., J.L.J., P.A., S.J.L.; clinical studies, C.X., W.L., J. L.J., P.A.; statistical analysis, G.C., B.D.W., C.X., Z.W., S.J.L.; and manuscript editing, G.C., B.D.W., C.X., J. L.J., M.F., P.A., S.J.L.
ISSN:0033-8419
1527-1315
1527-1315
DOI:10.1148/radiol.10100734