An empirical assessment of influences on POM research

Researchers in the field of production and operations management (POM), and those who evaluate them, need a clear, up-to-date picture of forums available for scholarly discourse in the field. Yet the literature contains no recent, large-scale, objective study of such publishing forums. We present th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inOmega (Oxford) Vol. 24; no. 3; pp. 337 - 345
Main Authors Goh, C.H., Holsapple, C.W., Johnson, L.E., Tanner, J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Exeter Elsevier Ltd 01.06.1996
Elsevier
Pergamon Press
Pergamon Press Inc
SeriesOmega
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Researchers in the field of production and operations management (POM), and those who evaluate them, need a clear, up-to-date picture of forums available for scholarly discourse in the field. Yet the literature contains no recent, large-scale, objective study of such publishing forums. We present the results of such a study. We employ a citation analysis methodology to examine citation trends for books, proceedings, and journals, and to determine a relative ranking of journals influencing POM research. Results of a previously reported subjective journal ranking were used to determine five base journals for our citation analysis. The data collection effort produced over 30,000 citations for the years 1989–1993. The journal rankings generated by our study are compared with those of the earlier subjective studies in the POM field.
ISSN:0305-0483
1873-5274
DOI:10.1016/0305-0483(95)00064-X