Comparison of Different Forms of Exercise Training in Patients With Cardiac Disease: Where Does High-Intensity Interval Training Fit?

• Published in: Canadian journal of cardiology Vol. 32; no. 4; pp. 485 - 494
• Main Authors: Gayda, Mathieu, PhD, Ribeiro, Paula A.B., PhD, Juneau, Martin, MD, Nigam, Anil, MD
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Elsevier Inc 01.04.2016
• Subjects: Cardiovascular; Exercise - physiology; Exercise Tolerance; Heart Diseases - physiopathology; Heart Diseases - rehabilitation; Humans; Quality of Life; Resistance Training - methods
• ISSN: 0828-282X; 1916-7075
• DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2016.01.017

Abstract In this review, we discuss the most recent forms of exercise training available to patients with cardiac disease and their comparison or their combination (or both) during short- and long-term (phase II and III) cardiac rehabilitation programs. Exercise training modalities to be discussed include inspiratory muscle training (IMT), resistance training (RT), continuous aerobic exercise training (CAET), and high-intensity interval training (HIIT). Particular emphasis is placed on HIIT compared or combined (or both) with other forms such as CAET or RT. For example, IMT combined with CAET was shown to be superior to CAET alone for improving functional capacity, ventilatory function, and quality of life in patients with chronic heart failure. Similarly, RT combined with CAET was shown to optimize benefits with respect to functional capacity, muscle function, and quality of life. Furthermore, in recent years, HIIT has emerged as an alternative or complementary (or both) exercise modality to CAET, providing equivalent if not superior benefits to conventional continuous aerobic training with respect to aerobic fitness, cardiovascular function, quality of life, efficiency, safety, tolerance, and exercise adherence in both short- and long-term training studies. Finally, short-interval HIIT was shown to be useful in the initiation and improvement phases of cardiac rehabilitation, whereas moderate- or longer-interval (or both) HIIT protocols appear to be more appropriate for the improvement and maintenance phases because of their high physiological stimulus. We now propose progressive models of exercise training (phases II-III) for patients with cardiac disease, including a more appropriate application of HIIT based on the scientific literature in the context of a multimodal cardiac rehabilitation program.