Winning the tournament for named professorships in management

• Published in: International journal of human resource management Vol. 20; no. 9; pp. 1843 - 1863
• Main Authors: Gomez-Mejia, Luis, Trevino, Len J, Mixon, Franklin G
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London Taylor & Francis Group 01.09.2009; Taylor & Francis LLC
• Subjects: Analyse; Betriebswirtschaftslehre; elite management journals; Estimates; Hochschullehrer; Human resource management; Justice; Management; named professorships; Operations management; Periodicals; Personalauswahl; procedural justice; Productivity; Professors; Publikation; Publishing; Scholarships; Social influence; Spiel; Spieltheorie; Strategic management; Studies; tournament theory; USA
• ISSN: 0958-5192; 1466-4399
• DOI: 10.1080/09585190903142316

We apply tournament theory to explain the process within which selection of named professorships takes place and a procedural justice test to justify winning the named professorship tournament. Specifically, we estimate the probability that management professors hold one of the highest rewards for academic research productivity, a named professorship, as a function of his or her research credentials, as measured by the number of articles published in a small core of elite management journals. Alphabetically, these are Academy of Management Journal, Academy of Management Review, Administrative Science Quarterly, Journal of Operations Management, Management Science, Operations Research, Organization Science, and Strategic Management Journal. Although each of the eight journals is positively related to the probability of attaining a named professorship, the Academy of Management Review and the Academy of Management Journal emerge as the two most influential management journals.