The Origins and Rationality of the “Legal versus Legitimate” Dichotomy Invoked in Mexico's 2006 Post-Electoral Conflict

• Published in: PS, political science & politics Vol. 40; no. 1; pp. 39 - 43
• Main Author: Eisenstadt, Todd A.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York, USA Cambridge University Press 01.01.2007
• Subjects: Conflicts; Democracy; Disputes; Election fraud; Elections; Electoral systems; Governors; Mexico; Political campaigns; Political candidates; Political leadership; Political parties; Presidential elections; Presidents; SYMPOSIUM—THE 2006 MEXICAN ELECTION AND ITS AFTERMATH; Vote recounts; Voting; Mexico
• ISSN: 1049-0965; 1537-5935
• DOI: 10.1017/S1049096507070072

Months after Mexico's independent electoral institute had validated the July 2, 2006, presidential elections, and weeks after the autonomous electoral court had certified National Action Party (PAN) candidate Felipe Calderón as president, runner-up Andrés Manuel López Obrador continued to cry foul. Days before the court's final September 5 ruling, López Obrador (known widely as “AMLO”), representing the Party of the Democratic Revolution (PRD) and the Coalition for the Good of All, decided to disband the mobilizations blocking some of Mexico City's main transportation arteries, but to continue protesting indefinitely, and to name a “shadow cabinet,” to press Calderón. López Obrador lost the election by a hair (a mere 233,831 votes, out of over 41,700,000 cast—the final certified number after electoral court rulings), but he did lose, and in a “free and fair” contest organized by one of the world's more respected electoral institutions.