Jerusalem and the riparian simile

Many see the city of Jerusalem as an intractable religious political issue, beyond the pale of negotiation and problem solving. This view reflects a set of problematic assumptions, including beliefs that Jerusalem produces a contest between maximalist claims that only power can resolve. In this arti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPolitical geography Vol. 21; no. 6; pp. 745 - 765
Main Authors Cohen, Shaul E, Frank, David A
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Elsevier Ltd 01.08.2002
Butterworth-Heinemann
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Many see the city of Jerusalem as an intractable religious political issue, beyond the pale of negotiation and problem solving. This view reflects a set of problematic assumptions, including beliefs that Jerusalem produces a contest between maximalist claims that only power can resolve. In this article, we conduct a conceptual exercise designed to rethink Jerusalem as an issue of political geography open to needs-based bargaining. Drawing from evidence in the Transboundary Freshwater Dispute Database, we suggest that riparian negotiations offer an analogue that might be used to restructure the discourse used in the negotiations about Jerusalem. We propose the use of a riparian simile in which negotiators begin with the assumption that “the conflict over Jerusalem is like international water disputes.” Riparian negotiations encourage movement from sovereign rights to functional needs, the use of time as a flexible variable, a focus on beneficial uses, and the creation of language recognizing local contingencies.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0962-6298
1873-5096
DOI:10.1016/S0962-6298(01)00079-8