Colour spaces in ecology and evolutionary biology

• Published in: Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society Vol. 92; no. 1; pp. 292 - 315
• Main Authors: Renoult, Julien P., Kelber, Almut, Schaefer, H. Martin
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.02.2017
• Subjects: Animals; Biologi; Biological Evolution; Biological Sciences; Color Perception - physiology; colour diversity; conspicuousness; discrimination; Ecologists; Ecology; Evolutionary biology; model selection; Models, Biological; Natural Sciences; Naturvetenskap; psychophysics; sensory ecology; signal; vision; visual communication; Zoologi; Zoology; vision; conspicuousness; model selection; visual communication; discrimination; colour diversity; psychophysics; signal; sensory ecology
• ISSN: 1464-7931; 1469-185X; 1469-185X
• DOI: 10.1111/brv.12230

ABSTRACT The recognition that animals sense the world in a different way than we do has unlocked important lines of research in ecology and evolutionary biology. In practice, the subjective study of natural stimuli has been permitted by perceptual spaces, which are graphical models of how stimuli are perceived by a given animal. Because colour vision is arguably the best‐known sensory modality in most animals, a diversity of colour spaces are now available to visual ecologists, ranging from generalist and basic models allowing rough but robust predictions on colour perception, to species‐specific, more complex models giving accurate but context‐dependent predictions. Selecting among these models is most often influenced by historical contingencies that have associated models to specific questions and organisms; however, these associations are not always optimal. The aim of this review is to provide visual ecologists with a critical perspective on how models of colour space are built, how well they perform and where their main limitations are with regard to their most frequent uses in ecology and evolutionary biology. We propose a classification of models based on their complexity, defined as whether and how they model the mechanisms of chromatic adaptation and receptor opponency, the nonlinear association between the stimulus and its perception, and whether or not models have been fitted to experimental data. Then, we review the effect of modelling these mechanisms on predictions of colour detection and discrimination, colour conspicuousness, colour diversity and diversification, and for comparing the perception of colour traits between distinct perceivers. While a few rules emerge (e.g. opponent log–linear models should be preferred when analysing very distinct colours), in general model parameters still have poorly known effects. Colour spaces have nonetheless permitted significant advances in ecology and evolutionary biology, and more progress is expected if ecologists compare results between models and perform behavioural experiments more routinely. Such an approach would further contribute to a better understanding of colour vision and its links to the behavioural ecology of animals. While visual ecology is essentially a transfer of knowledge from visual sciences to evolutionary ecology, we hope that the discipline will benefit both fields more evenly in the future.