Prognostic Value of the Duke Treadmill Score for Emergency Department Patients with Chest Pain

Abstract Background: The potential clinical utility of the Duke Treadmill Score (DTS) in the Emergency Department (ED) to risk-stratify patients with chest pain but negative cardiac biomarkers and non-diagnostic electrocardiograms is unclear. Objective: We evaluated whether DTS was associated with 3...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of emergency medicine Vol. 39; no. 2; pp. 135 - 143
Main Authors Manini, Alex F., MD, McAfee, Andrew T., MD, MSC, Noble, Vicki E., MD, Bohan, J. Stephen, MD, MS
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.08.2010
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Background: The potential clinical utility of the Duke Treadmill Score (DTS) in the Emergency Department (ED) to risk-stratify patients with chest pain but negative cardiac biomarkers and non-diagnostic electrocardiograms is unclear. Objective: We evaluated whether DTS was associated with 30-day adverse cardiac outcomes for low-risk ED patients with chest pain. Methods: For this prospective, observational cohort study, the primary outcome was any of the following at 30 days: cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or coronary revascularization. DTS risk categories (low, intermediate, high) were compared with 30-day cardiac outcomes. Results: We enrolled 191 patients, of whom 20 (10%) were lost to follow-up, leaving 171 patients (mean age 53.3 ± 12.4 years, 54% female, 3.5% adverse event rate) for evaluation. Sensitivity and specificity of DTS for 30-day events were 83.3% and 71.5%, respectively, with a 99.2% negative predictive value (confidence interval 95.4–99.9) for 30-day event-free survival. Conclusions: In this cohort of low-risk ED patients with chest pain, DTS demonstrated excellent negative predictive value for 30-day event-free survival and facilitated safe disposition of a large subset of patients.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0736-4679
2352-5029
DOI:10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.12.034