Strategies of Radioiodine Ablation in Patients with Low-Risk Thyroid Cancer

This trial compared two thyrotropin-stimulation methods and two 131I doses for postoperative ablation in patients with low-risk thyroid cancer. Rates of ablation were similar in all treatment groups. Doses lower than those currently recommended may be adequate for this condition. Radioiodine ( 131 i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe New England journal of medicine Vol. 366; no. 18; pp. 1663 - 1673
Main Authors Schlumberger, Martin, Catargi, Bogdan, Borget, Isabelle, Deandreis, Désirée, Zerdoud, Slimane, Bridji, Boumédiène, Bardet, Stéphane, Leenhardt, Laurence, Bastie, Delphine, Schvartz, Claire, Vera, Pierre, Morel, Olivier, Benisvy, Danielle, Bournaud, Claire, Bonichon, Françoise, Dejax, Catherine, Toubert, Marie-Elisabeth, Leboulleux, Sophie, Ricard, Marcel, Benhamou, Ellen
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Waltham, MA Massachusetts Medical Society 03.05.2012
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0028-4793
1533-4406
1533-4406
DOI10.1056/NEJMoa1108586

Cover

More Information
Summary:This trial compared two thyrotropin-stimulation methods and two 131I doses for postoperative ablation in patients with low-risk thyroid cancer. Rates of ablation were similar in all treatment groups. Doses lower than those currently recommended may be adequate for this condition. Radioiodine ( 131 i) is administered to patients with thyroid cancer after total thyroidectomy for three reasons 1 – 3 : first, to eradicate normal-thyroid remnants (ablation) in order to achieve an undetectable serum thyroglobulin level; second, to irradiate any neoplastic focus in order to decrease the risk of recurrence; and third, to perform 131 I total-body scanning for persistent carcinoma. Successful ablation is defined by the combination of undetectable serum thyroglobulin levels after thyrotropin stimulation and normal results on neck ultrasonography 6 to 12 months after 131 I administration. 2 , 3 When these criteria are met, approximately 1% of patients have a recurrence. 4 – 6 In . . .
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0028-4793
1533-4406
1533-4406
DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa1108586