Intergenerational resource rights, efficiency, and social optimality

In resource economics, the line demarcating efficiency and equity is often crossed. The term "optimal depletion" is often used when only efficient depletion is meant. Resource economists have generally espoused particular use rules that ensure efficiency but overlook possible improvements...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inLand economics Vol. 66; no. 1; pp. 1 - 11
Main Authors Howarth, R.B. (University of California, Berkeley), Norgaard, R.B
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Chicago University of Wisconsin Press 01.02.1990
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In resource economics, the line demarcating efficiency and equity is often crossed. The term "optimal depletion" is often used when only efficient depletion is meant. Resource economists have generally espoused particular use rules that ensure efficiency but overlook possible improvements in social welfare that can be achieved through the reassignment of property rights across generations. The evolution and current status of the misuse of the term optimal depletion is documented. A simple 2-generation, 3-period general equilibrium model is developed to illustrate how alternative distributions of resource rights between generations relate to alternative Pareto-efficient solutions. It is demonstrated how different social welfare functions affect the optimal solution and the associated assignment of resource rights between generations.
Bibliography:E11
E50
9026093
ISSN:0023-7639
1543-8325
DOI:10.2307/3146678