From conceptualising to modelling structural determinants and interventions in HIV transmission dynamics models: a scoping review and methodological framework for evidence-based analyses

• Published in: BMC medicine Vol. 22; no. 1; pp. 404 - 21
• Main Authors: Stannah, James, Flores Anato, Jorge Luis, Pickles, Michael, Larmarange, Joseph, Mitchell, Kate M, Artenie, Adelina, Dumchev, Kostyantyn, Niangoran, Serge, Platt, Lucy, Terris-Prestholt, Fern, Singh, Aditya, Stone, Jack, Vickerman, Peter, Phillips, Andrew, Johnson, Leigh, Maheu-Giroux, Mathieu, Boily, Marie-Claude
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 19.09.2024; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome; AIDS; Antiretroviral agents; Antiretroviral therapy; Computer Science; Disease transmission; Distribution; Dynamic structural analysis; Epidemiology; Exposure; Female; Gender; Health aspects; HIV; HIV (Viruses); HIV infection; HIV Infections - epidemiology; HIV Infections - transmission; Human immunodeficiency virus; Humans; Imprisonment; Life Sciences; Male; Mathematical modelling; Mathematical models; Modeling and Simulation; Modelling; Risk factors; Santé publique et épidémiologie; Sex industry; Social aspects; Social determinants of health; Social Stigma; Stigma; Structural factors; Structural interventions; Violence; Canada; Social determinants of health; Structural factors; Key populations; Structural interventions; HIV; Causal pathways; AIDS; Conceptual framework; Mathematical modelling; Mediation analysis; Structural
• ISSN: 1741-7015; 1741-7015
• DOI: 10.1186/s12916-024-03580-z

Including structural determinants (e.g. criminalisation, stigma, inequitable gender norms) in dynamic HIV transmission models is important to help quantify their population-level impacts and guide implementation of effective interventions that reduce the burden of HIV and inequalities thereof. However, evidence-based modelling of structural determinants is challenging partly due to a limited understanding of their causal pathways and few empirical estimates of their effects on HIV acquisition and transmission. We conducted a scoping review of dynamic HIV transmission modelling studies that evaluated the impacts of structural determinants, published up to August 28, 2023, using Ovid Embase and Medline online databases. We appraised studies on how models represented exposure to structural determinants and causal pathways. Building on this, we developed a new methodological framework and recommendations to support the incorporation of structural determinants in transmission dynamics models and their analyses. We discuss the data and analyses that could strengthen the evidence used to inform these models. We identified 17 HIV modelling studies that represented structural determinants and/or interventions, including incarceration of people who inject drugs (number of studies [n] = 5), violence against women (n = 3), HIV stigma (n = 1), and housing instability (n = 1), among others (n = 7). Most studies (n = 10) modelled exposures dynamically. Almost half (8/17 studies) represented multiple exposure histories (e.g. current, recent, non-recent exposure). Structural determinants were often assumed to influence HIV indirectly by influencing mediators such as contact patterns, condom use, and antiretroviral therapy use. However, causal pathways' assumptions were sometimes simple, with few mediators explicitly represented in the model, and largely based on cross-sectional associations. Although most studies calibrated models using HIV epidemiological data, less than half (7/17) also fitted or cross-validated to data on the prevalence, frequency, or effects of exposure to structural determinants. Mathematical models can play a crucial role in elucidating the population-level impacts of structural determinants and interventions on HIV. We recommend the next generation of models reflect exposure to structural determinants dynamically and mechanistically, and reproduce the key causal pathways, based on longitudinal evidence of links between structural determinants, mediators, and HIV. This would improve the validity and usefulness of predictions of the impacts of structural determinants and interventions.