The effect of airspeed and wind direction on human's thermal conditions and air distribution around the body

The purpose of this research was to investigate the effects of airspeed and wind direction on a human's thermal conditions and of air distribution around the body. In addition, this study presents the equivalent temperature, which is the most effective index to evaluate the effect of air moveme...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBuilding and environment Vol. 141; pp. 103 - 116
Main Authors Oh, Wonseok, Kato, Shinsuke
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Elsevier Ltd 15.08.2018
Elsevier BV
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The purpose of this research was to investigate the effects of airspeed and wind direction on a human's thermal conditions and of air distribution around the body. In addition, this study presents the equivalent temperature, which is the most effective index to evaluate the effect of air movement. The effect of convection and radiation on each part of the human body was estimated through numerical calculation, and the results were verified through a combination of thermal manikin experiments and radiation analysis. The experiments were conducted in a climate chamber and wind tunnel under conditions of natural convection and forced convection, respectively. An airspeed of 0.05 m/s was selected for the natural convection condition and an airspeed range of 0.2–2.0 m/s for forced convection conditions. The natural convective heat transfer coefficient in the stagnant environment was 3.27 W m−2 K−1 in the sitting posture and 2.67 W m−2 K−1 in the standing posture because the natural upward airflow caused by human body heat is more likely to diffuse to the surrounding environment in a sitting posture than in a standing posture. The equivalent temperature change of the whole body was greater in the standing posture than in the sitting posture when the airspeed was 0–0.2 m/s. The equivalent temperature change of the whole body was similar in both sitting and standing postures when the airspeed was greater than 0.2 m/s. •Natural convective heat transfer coefficient was higher in the sitting posture than in the standing posture.•Forced convective heat transfer coefficient was higher in the standing posture than in the sitting posture.•The equivalent temperature change and operative temperature were independent.•Equivalent temperature changes by airspeed and wind direction were presented in sitting and standing postures.
ISSN:0360-1323
1873-684X
DOI:10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.05.052