Combining fragmented QRS and TIMI score for predicting in-hospital short-term prognosis after acute myocardial infarction

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has a high mortality rate and poor prognosis for patients. The primary causes of death are arrhythmia and heart failure. For patients admitted because of myocardial infarction, various risk evaluations are initiated to foresee possible complications. The thrombolysi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of Zhejiang University. B. Science Vol. 19; no. 5; pp. 349 - 353
Main Authors Sheng, Qin-hui, Hsu, Chih Chi, Li, Jian-ping, Hong, Tao, Huo, Yong
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hangzhou Zhejiang University Press 01.05.2018
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has a high mortality rate and poor prognosis for patients. The primary causes of death are arrhythmia and heart failure. For patients admitted because of myocardial infarction, various risk evaluations are initiated to foresee possible complications. The thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) risk score, which can be used to predict the prognosis and the need for revascularisation, is the most convenient and commonly used system, but is inadequate for AMI patients on admittance. Fragmented QRS (fQRS) has been shown to be a valuable electrocardiographic (ECG) index for predicting the prognosis of patients with coronary heart disease. Also, fQRS is considered to predict an increased likelihood of a poor outcome and mortality in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), even for some successfully revascularized AMI patients. So what would happen if fQRS and the TIMI risk score were combined? This study focused on the investigation of the short-term prognostic value of fQRS combined with the TIMI risk score for patients with AMI.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Corresponding Author
The two authors contributed equally to this work
ISSN:1673-1581
1862-1783
DOI:10.1631/jzus.B1700413