Habitat-Dependency of Transect Walk and Pan Trap Methods for Bee Sampling in Farmlands

• Published in: Journal of Apicultural Science Vol. 63; no. 1; pp. 93 - 115
• Main Authors: Templ, Barbara, Mózes, Edina, Templ, Matthias, Földesi, Rita, Szirák, Ádám, Báldi, András, Kovács-Hostyánszki, Anikó
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Pulawy Sciendo 01.06.2019; De Gruyter Poland
• Subjects: Abundance; Agricultural land; Apis mellifera; bee survey; Bees; Bombus; Communities; Composition; Corn; Dasypoda; Dependence; Ecosystem services; Ecosystems; Fieldwork; Flowers; Habitats; Heterogeneity; Hylaeus; insect pollinators; Landscape; landscapes; Methods; Panurgus; Pollination; pollinators; redundancy analysis; Sampling; sampling bias; Sampling methods; Species composition; Species richness; Stubble; surveys; topography; transformation-based; Traps; Vegetation; wild bee; Woody plants
• ISSN: 2299-4831; 1643-4439; 2299-4831
• DOI: 10.2478/jas-2019-0014

Bees are the most important group of flower visitors providing an essential ecosystem service, namely pollination. Due to the worldwide decline of bees, there should be standardized sampling methods in place to ensure consistent and comparable results between studies. We compared the two commonly used sampling methods of yellow pan traps and transect walk to determine (i) which habitat variables affect the species composition, abundance and species richness of sampled bee communities, (ii) which method potentially contains sampling bias towards some individuals or groups of bees and (iii) the efficiency of sampling in various habitats. We conducted fieldwork in different agricultural habitats distributed along landscape heterogeneity and topography gradients. Our results showed that the height of vegetation, the average number of flowers and the amount of woody vegetation had the greatest influence on the sampling efficiency. Our survey also demonstrated that sampling by transect walk captured less bees in general, especially in stubble, maize, and cereal fields. We found that and spp. were well represented in samples collected by the transect walk method, while the abundance of other genera, especially and was higher in pan traps. Based on the results, we suggest (i) the transect walk method to compare samples of flower-visiting wild bee communities from various habitats of different vegetation and flower characteristics, (ii) application of the transect walk or pan traps to compare similar habitats and (iii) adoption of a comprehensive method which would incorporate both sampling techniques to gain a more complex insight into wild bee species composition.