Risk, Reward, and the Double-Edged Sword: Perspectives on Pharmacogenetic Research and Clinical Testing Among Alaska Native People
Pharmacogenetic research and clinical testing raise important concerns for individuals and communities, especially where past medical research and practice has perpetrated harm and cultivated distrust of health care systems and clinicians. We investigated perceptions of pharmacogenetics among Alaska...
Saved in:
Published in | American journal of public health (1971) Vol. 103; no. 12; pp. 2220 - 2225 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Washington, DC
American Public Health Association
01.12.2013
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Pharmacogenetic research and clinical testing raise important concerns for individuals and communities, especially where past medical research and practice has perpetrated harm and cultivated distrust of health care systems and clinicians. We investigated perceptions of pharmacogenetics among Alaska Native (AN) people.
We held four focus groups for 32 ANs in south central Alaska to elicit views about pharmacogenetics in general and for treatment of cardiovascular disease, breast cancer, depression, and nicotine addiction. We analyzed data for perceived risks and rewards of pharmacogenetics.
Potential risks of pharmacogenetics included health care rationing, misuse of information, and stigma to individuals and the AN community. Potential rewards included decreased care costs, improved outcomes, and community development. Participants also discussed 8 contingent conditions that could mitigate risks and increase pharmacogenetic acceptability.
Alaska Natives perceive pharmacogenetics as potentially benefitting and harming individuals, communities, and health systems, depending on methods and oversight. Researchers, clinicians, and administrators, especially in community-based clinic and health care systems serving minority populations, must address this "double-edged sword" to effectively conduct pharmacogenetics. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 W. Burke and D. A. Dillard have been involved with the study since its conceptual beginning and have participated as leaders in all phases of the research from design to data collection and dissemination. H. Starks was also involved in the design of the study and participated substantially in data analysis and writing and revision of the article. R. Robinson led the study operations at SCF and organized all study activities, including data collection and approvals from the Alaska Area Institutional Review Board and tribal health organization, as well as participated with H. Starks and J. L. Shaw in data analysis and writing the article. J. L. Shaw led the data analysis phase of the project, completed the analysis with H. Starks and R. Robinson, and led the writing team, which included the active participation and critical discussion among all listed contributors. Peer Reviewed Contributors |
ISSN: | 0090-0036 1541-0048 |
DOI: | 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301596 |