The ‘neurophysiological index’ predicts survival in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

© 2019 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Planning care in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), as well as designing clinical trials of putative therapies, requires measurement of disease severity, and rate of change. For some such p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical neurophysiology Vol. 130; no. 9; pp. 1684 - 1685
Main Authors Swash, Michael, de Carvalho, Mamede
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier B.V 01.09.2019
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:© 2019 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Planning care in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), as well as designing clinical trials of putative therapies, requires measurement of disease severity, and rate of change. For some such purposes an overall measure of disease severity is required, such as the amyotrophic lateral sclerosis functional rating scale (ALS-FRS) which takes account of various domains of disease-related difficulty, including dressing, washing, taking food, swallowing, standing and walking, breathing and coughing. However, for testing a response to a therapeutic a measurement sensitive to the disease process is needed. This need not be an overall measure but could be quite focused. Measurements of strength, whether using a hand-held dynamometer, or a clinical rating scale such as the MRC scale have been deployed, but there is a wide range of variance in such measures, and their inter-rater variability is suspect. In clinical practice, measures of ventilatory capacity are particularly important, but patient cooperation and marked facial weakness often undermine their sensitivity.
Bibliography:SourceType-Other Sources-1
content type line 63
ObjectType-Editorial-2
ObjectType-Commentary-1
ISSN:1388-2457
1872-8952
DOI:10.1016/j.clinph.2019.05.020