Meta-analysis of colonic reservoirs versus straight coloanal anastomosis after anterior resection
Background and methods: The comparative benefits and drawbacks of straight coloanal anastomosis (CAA), colonic $\font\ss=cmss10 scaled 1000 \hbox{\ss J}$‐pouch and coloplasty anastomosis after anterior resection are uncertain. Studies published between 1986 and 2005 of colonic $\font\ss=cmss10 scale...
Saved in:
Published in | British journal of surgery Vol. 93; no. 1; pp. 19 - 32 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Chichester, UK
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
01.01.2006
Wiley |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Background and methods:
The comparative benefits and drawbacks of straight coloanal anastomosis (CAA), colonic $\font\ss=cmss10 scaled 1000 \hbox{\ss J}$‐pouch and coloplasty anastomosis after anterior resection are uncertain. Studies published between 1986 and 2005 of colonic $\font\ss=cmss10 scaled 1000 \hbox{\ss J}$‐pouch versus transverse coloplasty or straight CAA were analysed. Endpoints included postoperative complications, and functional and physiological outcomes measured within 6 months, 1 year and 2 years or more after the procedure. A random‐effect model was used to aggregate the study endpoints and assess heterogeneity.
Results:
Thirty‐five studies containing 2240 patients (1066 straight CAA, 1050 $\font\ss=cmss10 scaled 1000 \hbox{\ss J}$‐pouch and 124 coloplasty) were included. There was no significant difference in postoperative complications between the three groups. There was a significant reduction in the frequency of defaecation per day by 1·88, 1·35 and 0·74 motions at the three time intervals in the $\font\ss=cmss10 scaled 1000 \hbox{\ss J}$‐pouch group compared with the straight CAA group. Faecal urgency was less prevalent in patients with a $\font\ss=cmss10 scaled 1000 \hbox{\ss J}$‐pouch than those with a straight CAA (odds ratio 0·27 at 6 months or less and 0·21 at 1 year). There was no difference in functional outcome between $\font\ss=cmss10 scaled 1000 \hbox{\ss J}$‐pouch and coloplasty anastomosis.
Conclusions:
The colonic $\font\ss=cmss10 scaled 1000 \hbox{\ss J}$‐pouch provided functional benefits over straight anastomosis with no increase in postoperative complications. Coloplasty appeared to have similar benefits but further studies are required for validation. Copyright © 2005 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
$\font\ss=cmss10 scaled 1000 \hbox{\ss J}$‐pouch advocated |
---|---|
Bibliography: | istex:9AF6A1A5FB036895F256C89378A59947957541F4 ark:/67375/WNG-WSQ644TX-4 ArticleID:BJS5188 ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 ObjectType-Review-3 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0007-1323 1365-2168 |
DOI: | 10.1002/bjs.5188 |