Serum Helicobacter pylori antibody reactivity in seven Asian countries using an automated latex aggregation turbidity assay
Background and Aim To determine the application range of diagnostic kits utilizing anti‐Helicobacter pylori antibody, we tested a newly developed latex aggregation turbidity assay (latex) and a conventional enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (E‐plate), both containing Japanese H. pylori protein lysat...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology Vol. 36; no. 8; pp. 2198 - 2209 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Australia
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
01.08.2021
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Background and Aim
To determine the application range of diagnostic kits utilizing anti‐Helicobacter pylori antibody, we tested a newly developed latex aggregation turbidity assay (latex) and a conventional enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (E‐plate), both containing Japanese H. pylori protein lysates as antigens, using sera from seven Asian countries.
Methods
Serum samples (1797) were obtained, and standard H. pylori infection status and atrophy status were determined by culture and histology (immunohistochemistry) using gastric biopsy samples from the same individuals. The two tests (enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay and latex) were applied, and receiver operating characteristics analysis was performed.
Results
Area under the curve (AUC) from the receiver operating characteristic of E‐plate and latex curves were almost the same and the highest in Vietnam. The latex AUC was slightly lower than the E‐plate AUC in other countries, and the difference became statistically significant in Myanmar and then Bangladesh as the lowest. To consider past infection cases, atrophy was additionally evaluated. Most of the AUCs decreased using this atrophy‐evaluated status; however, the difference between the two kits was not significant in each country, but the latex AUC was better using all samples. Practical cut‐off values were 3.0 U/mL in the E‐test and 3.5 U/mL in the latex test, to avoid missing gastric cancer patients to the greatest extent possible.
Conclusions
The kits were applicable in all countries, but new kits using regional H. pylori strains are recommended for Myanmar and Bangladesh. Use of a cut‐off value lower than the best cut‐off value is essential for screening gastric cancer patients. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | This work was supported by a grant from Grant‐in‐Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) of Japan (15H02657, 16H05191, 16H06279, 18KK0266, and 19H03473) to Y. Y. and (17K09353) to J. A. This study was also supported by the Bualuang ASEAN Chair Professorship at Thammasat University, Thailand. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Declaration of conflict of interest Financial support |
ISSN: | 0815-9319 1440-1746 |
DOI: | 10.1111/jgh.15467 |