Resilience as a multimodal dynamic process

• Published in: Early intervention in psychiatry Vol. 13; no. 4; pp. 725 - 732
• Main Authors: Stainton, Alexandra, Chisholm, Katharine, Kaiser, Nathalie, Rosen, Marlene, Upthegrove, Rachel, Ruhrmann, Stephan, Wood, Stephen J.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Melbourne Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd 01.08.2019; Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
• Subjects: Humans; Mental disorders; Mental Disorders - psychology; Mental health; Mental health care; Microprocessors; Protective Factors; psychiatric illness; psychopathology; Resilience; Resilience (Psychology); Resilience, Psychological; risk; risk; psychiatric illness; protective factors; psychopathology; resilience
• ISSN: 1751-7885; 1751-7893; 1751-7893
• DOI: 10.1111/eip.12726

Aim Resilience is rapidly gaining momentum in mental health literature. It provides a new understanding of the highly variable trajectories of mental illness, and has consistently been linked with improved mental health outcomes. The present review aims to clarify the definition of resilience and to discuss new directions for the field. Methods After discussing the definition of resilience, this narrative review synthesizes evidence that identifies the specific protective factors involved in this process. This review also addresses the mechanisms that underlie resilience. Results Recent literature has clarified the three core components of resilience, which are the presence of an adversity or specific risk for mental illness; the influence of protective factors that supersede this risk; and finally, a subsequently more positive outcome than expected. Now that these are largely agreed upon, the field should move on to addressing other topics. Resilience is a dynamic process by which individuals utilize protective factors and resources to their benefit. It can vary within one individual across time and circumstance. It can also refer to good functional outcomes in the context of diagnosable illness. While previous research has focused on psychological resilience, it is essential that resilience is conceptualized across modalities. Conclusions The field should move towards the development of a multimodal model of resilience. Researchers should now focus on producing empirical research which clarifies the specific protective factors and mechanisms of the process, aligning with the core concepts of resilience. This growing, more homogeneous evidence base, can then inform new intervention strategies.