Adaptive response to hydrogen peroxide in yeast: Induction, time course, and relationship to dose-response models

The assay for trp5 gene conversion and ilv1‐92 reversion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain D7 was used to characterize the induction of an adaptive response by hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). Effects of a small priming dose on the genotoxic effects of a larger challenge dose were measured in exponential...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEnvironmental and molecular mutagenesis Vol. 54; no. 6; pp. 384 - 396
Main Authors Hoffmann, George R., Moczula, Andrew V., Laterza, Amanda M., MacNeil, Lindsey K., Tartaglione, Jason P.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.07.2013
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The assay for trp5 gene conversion and ilv1‐92 reversion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain D7 was used to characterize the induction of an adaptive response by hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). Effects of a small priming dose on the genotoxic effects of a larger challenge dose were measured in exponential cultures and in early stationary phase. An adaptive response, indicated by smaller convertant and revertant frequencies after the priming dose, occurred at lower priming and challenge doses in young, well‐aerated cultures. Closely spaced priming doses from 0.000975 to 2 mM, followed by a 1 mM challenge, showed that the induction of the adaptive response is biphasic. In exponential cultures it was maximal with a priming dose of 0.125–0.25 mM. Very small priming doses were insufficient to induce the adaptive response, whereas higher doses contributed to damage. A significant adaptive response was detected when the challenge dose was administered 10–20 min after the priming exposure. It was fully expressed within 45 min, and the yeast began to return to the nonadapted state after 4–6 hr. Because of the similarity of the biphasic induction to hormetic curves and the proposal that adaptive responses are a manifestation of hormesis, we evaluated whether the low doses of H2O2 that induce the adaptive response show a clear hormetic response without a subsequent challenge dose. Hormesis was not evident, but there was an apparent threshold for genotoxicity at or slightly below 0.125 mM. The results are discussed with respect to linear, threshold, and hormesis dose–response models. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 54:384–396, 2013. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-3V9B3D7L-D
istex:E35EBEC0F1F4F19B510DABA6D48CD282E9B573E7
ArticleID:EM21785
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0893-6692
1098-2280
DOI:10.1002/em.21785