Olfactory transduction pathways in the Senegalese sole Solea senegalensis

This study tested whether differences in sensitivity between the upper and lower olfactory epithelia of Solea senegalensis are associated with different odorant receptors and transduction pathways, using the electro‐olfactogram. Receptor mechanisms were assessed by cross‐adaptation with amino acids...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of fish biology Vol. 83; no. 3; pp. 501 - 514
Main Authors Velez, Z., Hubbard, P. C., Barata, E. N., Canário, A. V. M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.09.2013
Blackwell
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This study tested whether differences in sensitivity between the upper and lower olfactory epithelia of Solea senegalensis are associated with different odorant receptors and transduction pathways, using the electro‐olfactogram. Receptor mechanisms were assessed by cross‐adaptation with amino acids (L‐cysteine, L‐phenylalanine and 1‐methyl‐L‐tryptophan) and bile acids (taurocholic acid and cholic acid). This suggested that relatively specific receptors exist for 1‐methyl‐L‐tryptophan and L‐phenylalanine (food‐related odorants) in the lower epithelium, and for taurocholic acid (conspecific‐derived odorant) in the upper. Inhibition by U73122 [a phospholipase C (PLC) inhibitor] suggested that olfactory responses to amino acids were mediated mostly, but not entirely, by PLC‐mediated transduction (IC50; 15–55 nM), whereas bile acid responses were mediated by both PLC and adenylate cyclase–cyclic adenosine monophosphate (AC–cAMP) (using SQ‐22536; an AC inhibitor). Simultaneous application of both drugs rarely inhibited responses completely, suggesting possible involvement of non‐PLC and non‐AC mediated mechanisms. For aromatic amino acids and bile acids, there were differences in the contribution of each transduction pathway (PLC, AC and non‐PLC and non‐AC) between the two epithelia. These results suggest that differences in sensitivity of the two epithelia are associated with differences in odorant receptors and transduction mechanisms.
Bibliography:Portuguese National Science Foundation
European Union Social Funds for Regional Development - No. POCI/BIA-BMC/55467/2004; No. SFRH/BD/16242/2004
ark:/67375/WNG-QQ19BJ7N-D
istex:559382DEC26295EA40893DC4D6AC09574D1B4747
ArticleID:JFB12185
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0022-1112
1095-8649
DOI:10.1111/jfb.12185