Ciliary muscle dimensions by swept‐source optical coherence tomography and correlation study in a large population

Purpose To examine ciliary muscle (CM) dimensions in vivo by swept‐source optical coherence tomography (SS‐OCT) in a large healthy population. To assess the reproducibility of CM measurements and correlations with different parameters. Methods In this cross‐sectional study, the following CM measurem...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inActa ophthalmologica (Oxford, England) Vol. 98; no. 4; pp. e487 - e494
Main Authors Fernández‐Vigo, José Ignacio, Shi, Hang, Kudsieh, Bachar, Arriola‐Villalobos, Pedro, De‐Pablo Gómez‐de‐Liaño, Lucía, García‐Feijóo, Julián, Fernández‐Vigo, José Ángel
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.06.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1755-375X
1755-3768
1755-3768
DOI10.1111/aos.14304

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Purpose To examine ciliary muscle (CM) dimensions in vivo by swept‐source optical coherence tomography (SS‐OCT) in a large healthy population. To assess the reproducibility of CM measurements and correlations with different parameters. Methods In this cross‐sectional study, the following CM measurements were made in 495 eyes of 495 subjects in the temporal and nasal quadrants: length (CML), area (CMA) and thickness at distances of 1000 μm (CMT1), 2000 μm (CMT2) and 3000 μm (CMT3) from the scleral spur using the SS‐OCT DRI‐Triton® (Topcon, Tokyo, Japan). These dimensions were then assessed for correlations with the factors age, gender, refractive error, anterior chamber angle (ACA) and intraocular pressure (IOP). The reproducibility of CM measurements was determined in 85 of the participants. Results Mean age was 41.4 ± 17.5 years (range 5–83). The following means were recorded as follows: CML = 4.57 ± 0.73 mm (range 2.16–6.97), CMA = 1.35 ± 0.31 mm2 (2.04–5.45), CMT1 = 558 ± 98 μm (299–891), CMT2 = 366 ± 100 μm (89–629) and CMT3 = 210 ± 75 μm (36–655). Negative correlation was detected between CML/CMA and age (R = −0.516/R = −0.404; p < 0.001) and refractive error (R = −0.519/R = −0.538; p < 0.001). No gender differences were observed (p ≥ 0.150). Both CML and CMA were correlated with ACA (R = 0.498 and 0.546; p < 0.001) and slightly with IOP (R = −0.175; p < 0.001). The reproducibility of the CM measurements was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient ≥0.878). Conclusions Swept‐source optical coherence tomography is a valid tool for in vivo CM measurements. Our data indicate a larger CM in myopes and its diminishing size with age.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1755-375X
1755-3768
1755-3768
DOI:10.1111/aos.14304