Hepatitis E seroprevalence in recipients of renal transplants or haemodialysis in southwest England: A case-control study

Locally acquired HEV infection is increasingly recognized in developed countries. Anti‐HEV IgG seroprevalence has been shown to be high in haemodialysis patients in a number of previous studies, employing assays of uncertain sensitivity. The aim of this study was to investigate anti‐HEV IgG seroprev...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of medical virology Vol. 85; no. 2; pp. 266 - 271
Main Authors Harrison, Alex, Scobie, Linda, Crossan, Claire, Parry, Rob, Johnston, Paul, Stratton, Jon, Dickinson, Steve, Ellis, Vic, Hunter, Jeremy G., Prescott, Oliver R., Madden, Richie, Lin, Nan X., Henley, William E., Bendall, Richard P., Dalton, Harry R.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01.02.2013
Wiley
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Locally acquired HEV infection is increasingly recognized in developed countries. Anti‐HEV IgG seroprevalence has been shown to be high in haemodialysis patients in a number of previous studies, employing assays of uncertain sensitivity. The aim of this study was to investigate anti‐HEV IgG seroprevalence in recipients of haemodialysis and renal transplants compared to a control group using a validated, highly sensitive assay. Eighty‐eight patients with functioning renal transplants and 76 receiving chronic haemodialysis were tested for HEV RNA and anti‐HEV IgG and IgM. Six hundred seventy controls were tested for anti‐HEV IgG. Anti‐HEV IgG was positive in 28/76 (36.8%) of haemodialysis and 16/88 (18.2%) of transplant patients. HEV RNA was not found in any patient. 126/670 (18.8%) of control subjects were anti‐HEV IgG positive. After adjusting for age and sex, there was a significantly higher anti‐HEV IgG seroprevalence amongst haemodialysis patients compared to controls (OR = 1.97, 95% CI = 1.16–3.31, P = 0.01) or transplant recipients (OR = 2.63, 95% CI = 1.18–6.07, P = 0.02). Patients with a functioning transplant showed no difference in anti‐HEV IgG seroprevalence compared to controls. The duration of haemodialysis or receipt of blood products were not significant risk factors for HEV IgG positivity. Patients receiving haemodialysis have a higher seroprevalence of anti‐HEV IgG than both age‐ and sex‐matched controls and a cohort of renal transplant patients. None of the haemodialysis patients had evidence of chronic infection. The reason haemodialysis patients have a high seroprevalence remains uncertain and merits further study. J. Med. Virol. 85:266–271, 2013. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Bibliography:istex:496A2F41C4245E989110FC29A74658649744302F
ArticleID:JMV23463
Duchy Healthcare Charity, Truro, Cornwall
Conflict of interest: H.R.D. has received travel, accommodation, and consultancy fees from GlaxoSmithKlein and Wantai.
National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)
CSO Scotland - No. FTM/32
ark:/67375/WNG-NBHMRCV7-S
Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC)
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0146-6615
1096-9071
DOI:10.1002/jmv.23463