Quality of life after liver resection for hepatobiliary malignancies
Background: Few prospective longitudinal studies have used a validated quality of life (QOL) instrument in patients undergoing liver resection for hepatobiliary malignancy. Methods: Patients undergoing liver resection for hepatobiliary tumours in a 1‐year period were enrolled. The cancer‐specific Eu...
Saved in:
Published in | British journal of surgery Vol. 95; no. 7; pp. 845 - 854 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Chichester, UK
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
01.07.2008
Wiley |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Background:
Few prospective longitudinal studies have used a validated quality of life (QOL) instrument in patients undergoing liver resection for hepatobiliary malignancy.
Methods:
Patients undergoing liver resection for hepatobiliary tumours in a 1‐year period were enrolled. The cancer‐specific European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer core questionnaire (EORTC QLQ‐C30) was completed before operation, and at 6, 12 and 36–48 months after surgery. QOL over time was analysed in relation to several clinical factors.
Results:
A total of 103 patients were enrolled. Patient compliance was at least 75 per cent at all stages. Most functional scales and the global QOL scale showed a non‐significant trend towards deterioration at 6 months and a return to preoperative level at 12 months. Physical functioning and dyspnoea deteriorated significantly at 6 months (P = 0·020 and P = 0·004 respectively) and did not recover by 12 months (P = 0·002 and P < 0·001 respectively). Pain and fatigue showed clinically significant deterioration over 12 months, which was not statistically significant. Survivors without recurrence at 36–48 months showed better QOL than those with recurrent disease.
Conclusion:
Major liver resection is associated with acceptable QOL outcomes, and QOL continues to improve in the long term in those without recurrence. Copyright © 2008 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Helpful to make treatment decisions |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ark:/67375/WNG-5DZDF28V-W The Editors have satisfied themselves that all authors have contributed significantly to this publication ArticleID:BJS6180 istex:17D000056E26C2874BB288164E85561395E50201 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0007-1323 1365-2168 |
DOI: | 10.1002/bjs.6180 |