Navigated Knee Kinematics After Tear of the ACL and Its Secondary Restraints: Preliminary Results

In this study we evaluated the role of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and its secondary restraint in controlling knee stability using a navigation system. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the kinematics of the knee in different conditions of instability: ACL intact, after transection...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inOrthopedics (Thorofare, N.J.) Vol. 33; no. 10; pp. 87 - 93
Main Authors MONACO, Edoardo, MAESTRI, Barbara, LABIANCA, Luca, SPERANZA, Attilio, KELLY, Matthew James, D'ARRIGO, Carmelo, FERRETTI, Andrea
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Thorofare, NJ Slack 01.10.2010
SLACK INCORPORATED
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In this study we evaluated the role of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and its secondary restraint in controlling knee stability using a navigation system. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the kinematics of the knee in different conditions of instability: ACL intact, after transection of the posterolateral (PL) bundle, after transection of the anteromedial (AM) bundle, and after lesion of the anterolateral femorotibial ligament (ALFTL). Anterior tibial translation and rotation were measured with a computer navigation system in 6 knees in whole fresh-frozen human cadavers by use of a manual maximum load. Anterior translation was evaluated at 30°, 60°, and 90° of flexion; rotation at 0°, 15°, 30°, 45°, 60°, and 90° of flexion. Cutting the PL bundle does not increase anterior translation and rotation of the knee. Cutting the AM bundle significantly increased the anteroposterior (AP) translation at 30° and 60° of flexion (In this study we evaluated the role of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and its secondary restraint in controlling knee stability using a navigation system. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the kinematics of the knee in different conditions of instability: ACL intact, after transection of the posterolateral (PL) bundle, after transection of the anteromedial (AM) bundle, and after lesion of the anterolateral femorotibial ligament (ALFTL). Anterior tibial translation and rotation were measured with a computer navigation system in 6 knees in whole fresh-frozen human cadavers by use of a manual maximum load. Anterior translation was evaluated at 30°, 60°, and 90° of flexion; rotation at 0°, 15°, 30°, 45°, 60°, and 90° of flexion. Cutting the PL bundle does not increase anterior translation and rotation of the knee. Cutting the AM bundle significantly increased the anteroposterior (AP) translation at 30° and 60° of flexion ( P =.01), but does not increase rotation of the knee. Cutting the ALFTL increased anterior translation at 60° of flexion ( P =.04) and rotation at 30°, 45°, and 60° of flexion ( P =.03). The PL bundle does not affect anterior translation and rotation of the knee. The AM bundle is the primary restraint of the anterior translation but does not affect rotation of the knee. The lateral compartment becomes the primary restraint of rotation after ACL cut. The primary kinematic effect of an ACL injury is an increase in anterior tibial translation, but there is no significant change in maximum internal or external rotation. The lesion of the ALFTL increases tibial rotation and could be correlated to the pivot shift phenomenon.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0147-7447
1938-2367
DOI:10.3928/01477447-20100510-58