Intra and Inter-Device Reliabilities of the Instrumented Timed-Up and Go Test Using Smartphones in Young Adult Population

• Published in: Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) Vol. 24; no. 9; p. 2918
• Main Authors: dos Santos, Thâmela Thaís Santos, Marques, Amélia Pasqual, Monteiro, Luis Carlos Pereira, Santos, Enzo Gabriel da Rocha, Pinto, Gustavo Henrique Lima, Belgamo, Anderson, Costa e Silva, Anselmo de Athayde, Cabral, André dos Santos, Kuliś, Szymon, Gajewski, Jan, Souza, Givago Silva, Silva, Tacyla Jesus da, Costa, Wesley Thyago Alves da, Salomão, Railson Cruz, Callegari, Bianca
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 01.05.2024
• Subjects: Accidental Falls - prevention & control; Adult; Analysis; biomechanical phenomena; Body mass index; Bone surgery; Experiments; Female; Frailty; Gait; Humans; Male; Medical personnel; Mobility; Older people; Professional ethics; program evaluation; Reproducibility of Results; research instrument evaluation; Sensors; Smart phones; Smartphone; Smartphones; Teenagers; test reproducibility; timed-up and go test; Validity; Young Adult; Young adults; Youth; Brazil; biomechanical phenomena; research instrument evaluation; smartphone; test reproducibility; timed-up and go test; program evaluation
• ISSN: 1424-8220; 1424-8220
• DOI: 10.3390/s24092918

The Timed-Up and Go (TUG) test is widely utilized by healthcare professionals for assessing fall risk and mobility due to its practicality. Currently, test results are based solely on execution time, but integrating technological devices into the test can provide additional information to enhance result accuracy. This study aimed to assess the reliability of smartphone-based instrumented TUG (iTUG) parameters. We conducted evaluations of intra- and inter-device reliabilities, hypothesizing that iTUG parameters would be replicable across all experiments. A total of 30 individuals participated in Experiment A to assess intra-device reliability, while Experiment B involved 15 individuals to evaluate inter-device reliability. The smartphone was securely attached to participants’ bodies at the lumbar spine level between the L3 and L5 vertebrae. In Experiment A, subjects performed the TUG test three times using the same device, with a 5 min interval between each trial. Experiment B required participants to perform three trials using different devices, with the same time interval between trials. Comparing stopwatch and smartphone measurements in Experiment A, no significant differences in test duration were found between the two devices. A perfect correlation and Bland–Altman analysis indicated good agreement between devices. Intra-device reliability analysis in Experiment A revealed significant reliability in nine out of eleven variables, with four variables showing excellent reliability and five showing moderate to high reliability. In Experiment B, inter-device reliability was observed among different smartphone devices, with nine out of eleven variables demonstrating significant reliability. Notable differences were found in angular velocity peak at the first and second turns between specific devices, emphasizing the importance of considering device variations in inertial measurements. Hence, smartphone inertial sensors present a valid, applicable, and feasible alternative for TUG assessment.