Auditory Feedback Differentially Modulates Behavioral and Neural Markers of Objective and Subjective Performance When Tapping to Your Heartbeat

• Published in: Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. 1991) Vol. 25; no. 11; pp. 4490 - 4503
• Main Authors: Canales-Johnson, Andrés, Silva, Carolina, Huepe, David, Rivera-Rei, Álvaro, Noreika, Valdas, Garcia, María del Carmen, Silva, Walter, Ciraolo, Carlos, Vaucheret, Esteban, Sedeño, Lucas, Couto, Blas, Kargieman, Lucila, Baglivo, Fabricio, Sigman, Mariano, Chennu, Srivas, Ibáñez, Agustín, Rodríguez, Eugenio, Bekinschtein, Tristan A
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Oxford University Press 01.11.2015
• Subjects: Acoustic Stimulation; Adult; Analysis of Variance; Awareness - physiology; Cluster Analysis; Electrocardiography; Electroencephalography; Epilepsy - pathology; Evoked Potentials, Auditory - physiology; Feedback, Sensory - physiology; Female; Heart Rate - physiology; Humans; Interoception - physiology; Male; Psychomotor Performance - physiology; Time Perception - physiology; Young Adult; learning; interoception; phase synchrony; heartbeat-evoked potential; metacognitive awareness
• ISSN: 1047-3211; 1460-2199
• DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhv076

Interoception, the perception of our body internal signals, plays a key role in maintaining homeostasis and guiding our behavior. Sometimes, we become aware of our body signals and use them in planning and strategic thinking. Here, we show behavioral and neural dissociations between learning to follow one's own heartbeat and metacognitive awareness of one's performance, in a heartbeat-tapping task performed before and after auditory feedback. The electroencephalography amplitude of the heartbeat-evoked potential in interoceptive learners, that is, participants whose accuracy of tapping to their heartbeat improved after auditory feedback, was higher compared with non-learners. However, an increase in gamma phase synchrony (30-45 Hz) after the heartbeat auditory feedback was present only in those participants showing agreement between objective interoceptive performance and metacognitive awareness. Source localization in a group of participants and direct cortical recordings in a single patient identified a network hub for interoceptive learning in the insular cortex. In summary, interoceptive learning may be mediated by the right insular response to the heartbeat, whereas metacognitive awareness of learning may be mediated by widespread cortical synchronization patterns.