A stepwise, ‘test-all-positives’ methodology to assess gluten-kernel contamination at the serving-size level in gluten-free (GF) oat production

•Gluten free claim compliance at the serving-size level provides the best protection.•Gluten free oats under Purity Protocol found 4% non-compliant at serving-size level.•Non-homogenous grinding dictates a reliable way to assess gluten compliance in oats.•Analytical scheme proposed and verified to a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFood chemistry Vol. 240; pp. 391 - 395
Main Authors Chen, Yumin, Fritz, Ronald D., Kock, Lindsay, Garg, Dinesh, Davis, R. Mark, Kasturi, Prabhakar
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier Ltd 01.02.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•Gluten free claim compliance at the serving-size level provides the best protection.•Gluten free oats under Purity Protocol found 4% non-compliant at serving-size level.•Non-homogenous grinding dictates a reliable way to assess gluten compliance in oats.•Analytical scheme proposed and verified to assess gluten in gluten-free oats. A step-wise, ‘test-all-positive-gluten’ analytical methodology has been developed and verified to assess kernel-based gluten contamination (i.e., wheat, barley and rye kernels) during gluten-free (GF) oat production. It targets GF claim compliance at the serving-size level (of a pouch or approximately 40–50g). Oat groats are collected from GF oat production following a robust attribute-based sampling plan then split into 75-g subsamples, and ground. R-Biopharm R5 sandwich ELISA R7001 is used for analysis of all the first15-g portions of the ground sample. A >20-ppm result disqualifies the production lot, while a >5 to <20-ppm result triggers complete analysis of the remaining 60-g of ground sample, analyzed in 15-g portions. If all five 15-g test results are <20ppm, and their average is <10.67ppm (since a 20-ppm contaminant in 40g of oats would dilute to 10.67ppm in 75-g), the lot is passed.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0308-8146
1873-7072
DOI:10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.07.153