Apparent Small Intestinal Absorption of Nitrogen and Minerals from Soy and Meat-Protein-Based Diets. A Study on Human Ileostomy Subjects
The apparent absorption of nitrogen and minerals was studied in 8 ileostomy subjects. Four different test diets containing 60 g of meat, rice and bread protein, or a 25% replacement of the protein with soy flour, soy concentrate or soy isolate, were randomly assigned to the subjects in 2-d periods....
Saved in:
Published in | The Journal of nutrition Vol. 116; no. 11; pp. 2209 - 2218 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Bethesda, MD
Elsevier Inc
01.11.1986
American Society for Nutritional Sciences |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The apparent absorption of nitrogen and minerals was studied in 8 ileostomy subjects. Four different test diets containing 60 g of meat, rice and bread protein, or a 25% replacement of the protein with soy flour, soy concentrate or soy isolate, were randomly assigned to the subjects in 2-d periods. All animal protein was replaced by soy isolate for a fifth 2-d period in two of the subjects. Ileostomy contents were collected in 2-h intervals during the day and in one portion during night and immediately deep-frozen. The fiber components and the phytic acid in the diet were almost completely recovered in the ileostomy contents, whereas unabsorbed starch was less than 2% of the intake. A significantly lower protein digestibility was observed when the diets containing soy protein were fed. No difference in protein digestibility was found between the different soy protein products. A 25% replacement by soy protein had no obvious effect on apparent mineral absorption. A low protein digestibility was also observed when soy was the main source of protein, and a negative apparent absorption of zinc was found in both subjects. Although 25% of soy protein in the diet does not seem to impair mineral absorption significantly, small intestinal net absorption of nitrogen is less from the soy diets than from the meat diet. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | S20 880446788 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
ISSN: | 0022-3166 1541-6100 |
DOI: | 10.1093/jn/116.11.2209 |