Single agent activity of oxaliplatin in heavily pretreated advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

Background: Platinum-containing chemotherapy combinations achieve high response rates in women with advanced ovarian cancer. Unfortunately, most patients need further therapeutic options. Oxaliplatin (L-OHP) is a diaminocyclohexane (DACH) platinum analog active against human and murine cells in vitr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnnals of oncology Vol. 7; no. 10; pp. 1065 - 1070
Main Authors Chollet, P., Bensmaïne, M. A., Brienza, S., Deloche, C., Curé, H., Caillet, H., Cvitkovic, E.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Oxford University Press 01.12.1996
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background: Platinum-containing chemotherapy combinations achieve high response rates in women with advanced ovarian cancer. Unfortunately, most patients need further therapeutic options. Oxaliplatin (L-OHP) is a diaminocyclohexane (DACH) platinum analog active against human and murine cells in vitro and in vivo, including ovarian cells lines, with non-cross resistance characteristics with first (CDDP) and second (CBDCA) generation platinum compounds. The single agent activity of oxaliplatin in 34 consecutive platinum-pretreated ovarian cancer patients, not eligible for other phase II trials, was explored in a compassionate use program framework in a single institution. Materials and methods: Thirty-five patients (34 of them eligible) were treated by L-OHP at the median initial dose of 100 mg/sqm q 3 weeks (5 patients: 58–89 mg/m2; 24 patients: 90–100 mg/m2; 6 patients: 120–130 mg/m2) by short (30′-2 hours) i.v. infusion; the treatment was repeated every three weeks until treatment limiting toxicity or disease progression. Results: Thirty-one patients (median previous chemotherapy lines: 3) were evaluable for antitumoral activity, with a 29% objective response rate. According to Markman's criteria, objective partial responses were seen in six out of 13 evaluable potentially platinum-sensitive patients (46%) and three responses in the 18 evaluable platinum-resistant patients (17%). The tolerance was excellent, with no grade 3–4 (WHO) leukoneutropenia despite previous ABMT and abdominopelvic radiotherapy in six and eight cases, respectively. There was no renal or ototoxicity, and nausea/vomiting were moderate. The only grade 3 (WHO) peripheral neuropathy recorded concerned a patient with a neurotoxicity status grade 2 at baseline. Conclusion: The 29% ORR single agent activity of oxaliplatin at hematological subtoxic doses in heavily pretreated ovarian cancer patients, with objective responses in platinum refractory patients, supports experimental data on non crossresistance and a differential clinical toxicity prome to other available platinum compounds. The 12 month median overall survival of this poor prognosis patients cohort (62% platinum-refractory patients, median number of three previous chemotherapy lines) gives a strong empirical basis for the further exploration of oxaliplatin's role in confirmatory phase II and combination chemotherapy studies.
Bibliography:Correspondence to: Philippe Chollet, MD Centre Jean Perrin 58, rue Montalembert 63011 Clermont-Ferrand France
istex:28E1EF0137E2DCB7945821FB75BFB759B4D8001F
ArticleID:7.10.1065
ark:/67375/HXZ-9SNCP6LF-8
ISSN:0923-7534
1569-8041
DOI:10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a010500