AssessORF: combining evolutionary conservation and proteomics to assess prokaryotic gene predictions

Abstract Motivation A core task of genomics is to identify the boundaries of protein coding genes, which may cover over 90% of a prokaryote's genome. Several programs are available for gene finding, yet it is currently unclear how well these programs perform and whether any offers superior accu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBioinformatics Vol. 36; no. 4; pp. 1022 - 1029
Main Authors Korandla, Deepank R, Wozniak, Jacob M, Campeau, Anaamika, Gonzalez, David J, Wright, Erik S
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Oxford University Press 15.02.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Motivation A core task of genomics is to identify the boundaries of protein coding genes, which may cover over 90% of a prokaryote's genome. Several programs are available for gene finding, yet it is currently unclear how well these programs perform and whether any offers superior accuracy. This is in part because there is no universal benchmark for gene finding and, therefore, most developers select their own benchmarking strategy. Results Here, we introduce AssessORF, a new approach for benchmarking prokaryotic gene predictions based on evidence from proteomics data and the evolutionary conservation of start and stop codons. We applied AssessORF to compare gene predictions offered by GenBank, GeneMarkS-2, Glimmer and Prodigal on genomes spanning the prokaryotic tree of life. Gene predictions were 88–95% in agreement with the available evidence, with Glimmer performing the worst but no clear winner. All programs were biased towards selecting start codons that were upstream of the actual start. Given these findings, there remains considerable room for improvement, especially in the detection of correct start sites. Availability and implementation AssessORF is available as an R package via the Bioconductor package repository. Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1367-4803
1460-2059
1367-4811
DOI:10.1093/bioinformatics/btz714