Instrumental, Narrow, Normative? Reviewing recent work on religion and development

• Published in: Third world quarterly Vol. 32; no. 7; pp. 1291 - 1306
• Main Authors: Jones, Ben, Petersen, Marie Juul
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London Routledge 01.08.2011; Routledge Journals; Taylor & Francis Ltd
• Subjects: Area development; Banking; Buddhism; Charities; Christianity; Conceptualization; Criticism; Development planning; Development programmes; Development Programs; Development studies; Faith; International relations; Islam; NGOs; Nongovernmental organizations; Political cooperation; Religion; Religion and politics; Religions; Religious Beliefs; Religious groups; Religious organizations; Research trends; Spiritual belief systems; Spirituality; Universities; World Bank
• ISSN: 0143-6597; 1360-2241
• DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2011.596747

There is a growing body of research on religion and development, primarily from development scholars and practitioners. In many ways this represents a new departure for development studies, which has been largely uninterested in religion in the past. This growing interest can be explained through a number of inter-linking factors, including the persistence of religion in much of the world, and the sense that existing approaches to development have been ineffective. In reviewing the literature we put forward three broad criticisms. First, it is instrumental in its approach-it is interested in understanding how religion can be used to do development 'better'. Second, it has a narrow focus on faith-based organisations, which is in many ways a consequence of the need to understand religion instrumentally. Third, it is based on normative assumptions in terms of how both religion and development are conceptualised: religion is understood to be apart from 'mainstream' development, while development is defined as that thing that development agencies do. In making sense of these criticisms we emphasise the extent to which the recent interest in religion and development has come from donors and development agencies. We found little evidence of academic research on religion and development prefiguring the interest of the World Bank or bilateral agencies. The article concludes with some suggestions of how to move forward.