Comparison of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion as Corrective Surgery for Patients with Adult Spinal Deformity—A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

• Published in: Journal of clinical medicine Vol. 10; no. 20; p. 4737
• Main Authors: Matsukura, Yu, Yoshii, Toshitaka, Morishita, Shingo, Sakai, Kenichiro, Hirai, Takashi, Yuasa, Masato, Inose, Hiroyuki, Kawabata, Atsuyuki, Utagawa, Kurando, Hashimoto, Jun, Tomori, Masaki, Torigoe, Ichiro, Yamada, Tsuyoshi, Kusano, Kazuo, Otani, Kazuyuki, Sumiya, Satoshi, Numano, Fujiki, Fukushima, Kazuyuki, Tomizawa, Shoji, Egawa, Satoru, Arai, Yoshiyasu, Shindo, Shigeo, Okawa, Atsushi
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 15.10.2021; MDPI
• Subjects: adult spinal deformity (ASD); Bias; Body mass index; Clinical medicine; Disease; Epidural; Hematoma; lateral lumbar interbody fusion; perioperative complications; posterior lumbar interbody fusion; sagittal correction; Scoliosis; Surgery; surgical invasiveness; Surgical outcomes; Vertebrae; United States > US
• ISSN: 2077-0383; 2077-0383
• DOI: 10.3390/jcm10204737

Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) is increasingly performed as corrective surgery for patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD). This paper compares the surgical results of LLIF and conventional posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF)/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in ASD using a propensity score matching analysis. We retrospectively reviewed patients with ASD who received LLIF and PLIF/TLIF, and investigated patients’ backgrounds, radiographic parameters, and complications. The propensity scores were calculated from patients’ characteristics, including radiographic parameters and preoperative comorbidities, and one–to-one matching was performed. Propensity score matching produced 21 matched pairs of patients who underwent LLIF and PLIF/TLIF. All radiographic parameters significantly improved in both groups at the final follow-up compared with those of the preoperative period. The comparison between both groups demonstrated no significant difference in terms of postoperative pelvic tilt, lumbar lordosis (LL), or pelvic incidence–LL at the final follow-up. However, the sagittal vertical axis tended to be smaller in the LLIF at the final follow-up. Overall, perioperative and late complications were comparable in both procedures. However, LLIF procedures demonstrated significantly less intraoperative blood loss and a smaller incidence of postoperative epidural hematoma compared with PLIF/TLIF procedures in patients with ASD.