Bone mineral density changes over two years in first-time users of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate

To compare longitudinal changes in bone mineral density (BMD) among first-time depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) users to women using no hormonal contraception, and evaluate user characteristics associated with that BMD change. Prospective longitudinal study. Healthy volunteers in an academic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFertility and sterility Vol. 82; no. 6; pp. 1580 - 1586
Main Authors Clark, M. Kathleen, Sowers, MaryFran R., Nichols, Sara, Levy, Barcey
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.12.2004
Elsevier Science
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To compare longitudinal changes in bone mineral density (BMD) among first-time depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) users to women using no hormonal contraception, and evaluate user characteristics associated with that BMD change. Prospective longitudinal study. Healthy volunteers in an academic research environment. Women, aged 18 to 35, choosing DMPA for contraception (n = 178) and women using no hormonal contraception (n = 145). Hip and spine BMD measured, at three-month intervals for 24 months, by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. Mean hip BMD declined 2.8% (SE = 0.034) 12 months following DMPA initiation and 5.8% (SE = 0.096) after 24 months. Mean spine (L1–L3) BMD declined 3.5% (SE = 0.022) and 5.7% (SE = 0.034), respectively, after one and two years of DMPA use. Mean hip and spine BMD of control participants changed less than 0.9% over the same period. Among DMPA users, body mass index (BMI) change was inversely associated with BMD change at the hip, but not at the spine. Calcium intake, physical activity, and smoking did not influence BMD change in either group. Hip and spine BMD declined after one DMPA injection and this decline continued with each subsequent injection for 24 months. With the exception of increasing BMI among DMPA users, no user characteristics offered protection against DMPA-related BMD loss.
ISSN:0015-0282
1556-5653
DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.04.064