Influence of flow-through and renewal exposures on the toxicity of copper to rainbow trout

We examined changes in water chemistry and copper (Cu) toxicity in three paired renewal and flow-through acute bioassays with rainbow trout ( Oncorhynchus mykiss). Test exposure methodology influenced both exposure water chemistry and measured Cu toxicity. Ammonia and organic carbon concentrations w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEcotoxicology and environmental safety Vol. 69; no. 2; pp. 199 - 208
Main Authors Welsh, Paul G., Lipton, Joshua, Mebane, Christopher A., Marr, John C.A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published San Diego, CA Elsevier Inc 01.02.2008
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We examined changes in water chemistry and copper (Cu) toxicity in three paired renewal and flow-through acute bioassays with rainbow trout ( Oncorhynchus mykiss). Test exposure methodology influenced both exposure water chemistry and measured Cu toxicity. Ammonia and organic carbon concentrations were higher and the fraction of dissolved Cu lower in renewal tests than in paired flow-through tests. Cu toxicity was also lower in renewal tests; 96 h dissolved Cu LC 50 values were 7–60% higher than LC 50s from matching flow-through tests. LC 50 values in both types of tests were related to dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentrations in exposure tanks. Increases in organic carbon concentrations in renewal tests were associated with reduced Cu toxicity, likely as a result of the lower bioavailability of Cu-organic carbon complexes. The biotic ligand model of acute Cu toxicity tended to underpredict toxicity in the presence of DOC. Model fits between predicted and observed toxicity were improved by assuming that only 50% of the measured DOC was reactive, and that this reactive fraction was present as fulvic acid.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0147-6513
1090-2414
DOI:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2007.04.003