Measuring tissue hemodynamics and oxygenation by continuous-wave functional near-infrared spectroscopy-how robust are the different calculation methods against movement artifacts?

Continuous-wave near-infrared spectroscopy and imaging enable tissue hemodynamics and oxygenation to be determined non-invasively. Movements of the investigated subject can cause movement artifacts (MAs) in the recorded signals. The strength and type of MAs induced depend on the measurement principl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPhysiological measurement Vol. 35; no. 4; pp. 717 - 734
Main Authors Scholkmann, Felix, Metz, Andreas Jaakko, Wolf, Martin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England IOP Publishing 01.04.2014
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Continuous-wave near-infrared spectroscopy and imaging enable tissue hemodynamics and oxygenation to be determined non-invasively. Movements of the investigated subject can cause movement artifacts (MAs) in the recorded signals. The strength and type of MAs induced depend on the measurement principle. The aim of the present study was to investigate the quantitative relationship between different single-distance (SD) and multi-distance (MD) measurement methods and their susceptibility to MAs. We found that each method induces MAs to a different degree, and that MD methods are more robust against MAs than SD methods.
Bibliography:Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine
PMEA-100003.R1
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0967-3334
1361-6579
1361-6579
DOI:10.1088/0967-3334/35/4/717